Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (8) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ents : Mr. D. Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar , Junior Standing Counsel ORDER These writ petitions challenge the orders rejecting applications under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Income Tax Act). 2. The petitioner is a resident of the United States of America. He is assessed to tax in India and filed his return of income in India. In the financial year 2018-2019, the petitioner s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... deducted at sources for the relevant assessment years and that he was entitled to refund. Therefore, applications were filed before the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act seeking condonation of delay. The said applications were dismissed by orders impugned herein. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Commissioner of Income Tax failed to tak....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....terpreted in several judgments, including of this Court, and it has been held that the provision should receive a liberal construction. The primary consideration in such applications is whether genuine hardship would be caused to the applicant. In this case, the applicant is an individual assessee. He resides in the United States of America. The two relevant assessment years were years when normal....