Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2024 (7) TMI 1427

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ijay Shah, CA ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM: This appeal by the Department is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-38, New Delhi [in short 'the CIT(A)'] dated 25.07.2018, for assessment year 2004-05. 2. The solitary issue raised by the department in appeal is against allowing interest u/s. 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act&#39....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....any for any assessment year then, credit in respect of tax so paid shall be allowed to him, in accordance with the provisions of Section 115JAA of the Act. In light of the aforesaid provisions assessee is not eligible to claim interest on MAT credit. 4. Per contra, Ms. Alka Arren appearing on behalf of the assessee submits that the assessee has not claimed interest on MAT credit. The assessee has....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessee is that the CIT(A) has allowed interest on refund of advance tax paid by the assessee for AY 2004-05, per contra stand of the department is that the CIT(A) has erred in allowing interest on MAT credit allowed by the AO in proceedings u/s. 154 of the Act. 6. A perusal of impugned order shows that the CIT(A) following the decisions rendered in the case of CIT vs. Tulsyan NEC 330 ITR 223 (....