Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (7) TMI 1427

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ijay Shah, CA ORDER PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM: This appeal by the Department is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-38, New Delhi [in short 'the CIT(A)'] dated 25.07.2018, for assessment year 2004-05. 2. The solitary issue raised by the department in appeal is against allowing interest u/s. 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act&#39....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....any for any assessment year then, credit in respect of tax so paid shall be allowed to him, in accordance with the provisions of Section 115JAA of the Act. In light of the aforesaid provisions assessee is not eligible to claim interest on MAT credit. 4. Per contra, Ms. Alka Arren appearing on behalf of the assessee submits that the assessee has not claimed interest on MAT credit. The assessee has....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessee is that the CIT(A) has allowed interest on refund of advance tax paid by the assessee for AY 2004-05, per contra stand of the department is that the CIT(A) has erred in allowing interest on MAT credit allowed by the AO in proceedings u/s. 154 of the Act. 6. A perusal of impugned order shows that the CIT(A) following the decisions rendered in the case of CIT vs. Tulsyan NEC 330 ITR 223 (....