Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (6) TMI 1491

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Ld. CIT ( A) upheld the same by confirming the said addition and did not considered daily manufacturing report filed by the appellant. It is prayed that the addition of Rs. 30,966/- may please be deleted as correct facts have not been considered by A.O. 2. That on facts and in law the AO was wrong in addition of Rs. 2,65,46,540/- on a/ c of Sugar ( being difference between books of account and physical verification in various units), the ld. CIT ( A) upheld the same by confirming the said addition and did not considered daily manufacturing report filed by the appellant. The Ld. CIT ( A) did not consider the merits of the arguments filed by the appellant. It is prthat the addition of Rs. 2,65,46,540/- may please be deleted consid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....loss of Rs. 52,65,55,831/-. 5. The issues sustained by the ld. CIT(A) and contested before us are as under: Nature of Addition Amount Difference in Stock of Sugar from the books Rs. 2,64,06,668 /- Difference in Stock of Molasses from the books Rs. 9,79,336 /- Sale of Press Mud Rs. 30,966 /- Difference in cash found and Cash Book Rs. 13,10,388 /- Difference in Stock : 6. The AO made an addition of Rs.2,65,46,540/- on account of difference between books of accounts and physical Stock of Sugar at different units. It was argued that there was no 'actual difference' in stock but only a discrepancy as Production on the day of search could not be entered in books which were seized. 7. The pertinent fa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Unit for 07 .04.2010 showing production of 6000 Qtls. of Sugar, which could not be entered into the daily stock register because it was seized. PB 111 -113  is the copy of the Stock Register (RG-1 ) for Libberheri Unit for Season( s) 2009 - 10, 2008 -09-2007-08 Barkatpur Unit: PB 128 Is the copy of the Daily Manufacturing Report ( DMR) of Barkatpur Unit showing production of 5700 Qtls. of Sugar, Molasses which could not be entered into the daily stock register, which we seized PB 129 -132  Is the copy of the Stock Register (RG-1 ) for Barkatpur Unit for 2009 - 10 & 2008 - 09 9. The production of sugar, which is a continuous and requires multiple simultaneous processes leads to regular inflow of sugar, and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e also gone through the annual production and find that the production on the day of search has not been taken into account owing to the search operation conducted at the premises. The amount and the quantum of sugar are in tune with average daily production. In view of the entirety of the facts narrated above, we hold that no addition is called for on account of difference in the stock of sugar. Difference in Molasses: 12. The AO made addition on account of difference in the stock of molasses [( AO Page 11, CIT( A) Page 130] Stock ( in Qtls.) Libberheri, Roorkee  Barkatpur, Bijnore Khaikeri, Muzaffarngar Shermau As per Books 175,172 2,12,440 45,049 34,189 As per Physical Verification 1,75,711 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or sugar, as is being alleged. Hence, we hold that no addition on account of difference in molasses is called for. Unaccounted Cash: 14. The AO made addition on account of the difference between cash as per the books and physical cash found at different premises of the assessee-company {(AO Pg. 14, 15, 16, CIT( A) Pg 20 )}. 15. Before us, it was submitted that certain vouchers pertaining to cash transactions undertaken on 06 04.2010 ( day prior to search) were not updated in the cash book which led to the difference in cash found and the books. 16. The said fact of the vouchers not being updated in the cash book was even confirmed by an employee of the assessee- corporation, Sh. Mahesh Patel, at the time of recording of his stat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onciliation statement is as under: Cash as per books Rs. 5,45,648 /- Less:- Payment Vouchers pending to be entered in the books ( fact verified by the search team) ( PB 139, 140 - 147 ) - Rs. 94,912 /- Add: Cash received on 06 04 2010 from sale of press mud, which was pending to be entered into the books + Rs. 584 /- Physical Cash Found Rs. 4,51,320 /- Noida: 19. Cash as per books amounted to Rs. 2,89,700/- and physical cash aggregating to Rs. 4,89,000/- was found. The difference of Rs. 1,99,700/- was added to the income. The reconciliation statement is as under: Cash as per books 2,89,700 Add:- C ash received from Libberheri Roorkee Unit on 06 04 2010 but voucher was pending for entry I n books ( PB 1....