TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (7) TMI 880
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....1), Raipur. 1. The grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are as under: 1. "Whether in Law and on the facts and the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble CIT(Appeals) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 72,42,648/- on account of unexplained cash credit found in the books of the assessee." 2. "Whether in Law and on the facts and the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble CIT(Appeals) has erred in not appreciating or appraising the evidence and arguments submitted by the Assessing Officer that the assessee has failed to discharge its burden under section 68 of the Act." 3. "Whether in Law and on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble CIT(Appeals) has erred in deleting the Penalty proceedings initiated by the Asses....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssessment proceedings were initiated, statutory notices were issued and in compliance, the AR of the assessee has filed requisite submissions online a/w supporting documents, which were examined and placed on records. On thorough verifications of ITR, Audit Report, Books of Accounts and other records made available by the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings, Ld. AO has observed an issue pertaining to unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 12,55,16,151/- in the Bank Account of the Assessee's firm. Month wise details of Cash deposits were called for from the assessee a/w explanation for source and proof of such deposits. From the details submitted by the assessee Ld. AO has observed that during the period from 01.11.2016 till 09.11....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... assessee with the observation that the onus cast on the appellant has been discharged, consequently, the addition u/s 68 has been deleted. 5. Dissatisfied with the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) the department is now in appeal before us. 6. Ld. Sr DR before us has submitted that the issue in the present case relates to demonetisation period therefore the Ld. AO has specifically examined such period and found extraordinary cash deposits in the account of the assessee for which the assessee has explained that the amount were received from the debtors, but has squarely failed in substantiate by producing any evidences in support of their contention like purchase invoices, booking invoices, Address and contact details of the parties etc. before ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....T Bench, Jaipur in the case of ACIT vs. Shri Chandra Surana in ITA No. 166/JP/2022, wherein it is held that section 68 cannot be invoked in respect of cash sale which have been furnished in the books of account and accepted by the department. Ld. AR further placed his reliance on the judgment in the case of Smt Harshil Chordia vs. ITO 298 ITR 349, wherein Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court has held that when money is received against shell then section 68 cannot be invoked. 8. On factual aspects, it is submitted by the Ld. AR that the substantial amount has been received in the first 15 days of the month of November of every year. The assessee, therefore, received a huge cash from farmers i.e., immediately after the crop has sold. Ld. AR further....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... is ostensible that the explanations of the assessee regarding amounts received in cash from debtors are not enough to substantiate the genuineness of cash receipts, the assessee has failed in discharging its duties in submitting the requisite documents like purchase of invoices, booking invoices, address, and contact details of the parties from any concerned parties, so as to corroborate the explanations which have been offered before the Ld. AO. The details produced before the AO were again produced before the Ld. CIT(A), however, on perusal of the order of Ld CIT(A), it is arising that the Ld. CIT(A) has believed the contentions of the assessee summarily without verifying or examining or calling for the necessary documents which were vit....