Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Directors Shielded from Direct Action; Company Liable Despite Strike-Off; NRI Gift Excluded from Unexplained Income.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The court held that action against directors cannot be directly taken u/s 179, and where the company's name is struck off, action can still be taken against the company as per law. The impugned order adding one-third of the credited amount as directors' income was set aside. The revenue can take appropriate action against the company. Regarding the gift received from an NRI grandson, it was held that the amount cannot be treated as income from unexplained sources u/s 69A, as section 56 was not invoked. The amount added in the grandson's hands cannot be added again in the assessee's hands, as it would lead to double addition. If treated as income u/s 68, the assessee must prove identity, genuineness, and capacity, which is satisfied as the source is the grandson's bank account. The addition u/ss 68 and 69A was directed to be deleted in favor of the assessee.....