Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (7) TMI 487

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent ORDER Per : P. A. Augustian Issue in the present appeal is regarding refund of Additional Duty of Customs (CVD) demanded from the respondent after introduction of GST on imported goods. The respondent had exported automobile components and availed drawback of Rs. 2,81,327/-. Thereafter portion of the components exported by the respondent returned by USA customers and on arri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on under Section 26A (2) of the Customs Act, 1962. Aggrieved by said order, an appeal was filed and Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the appeal. Aggrieved by said order, present appeal is filed. 2. When the appeal came up for hearing, Ld. AR submits that the only ground of the appeal is whether provisions of Section 26A of the Customs Act is applicable in this case and whether the refund applicatio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lumn No. 3 of the Notification No. 46/2017-Cus dated 30.06.2017. The respondent complied with the above Notification by paying the drawback claimed by them with interest. The learned counsel further submits that on introduction of GST on 01.07.2017, CVD levied and collected on import of goods is without any authority of law and illegal. It was paid at the relevant time due to system error and as i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion provided under Section 27 of the said Act of 1962 will not be applicable. Therefore, the Tribunal has erred in law and fact, solely relying on Section 27 of the said Act of 1962 while dismissing the application of the appellant-Company". 4. Ld. counsel for the respondent also relied upon the following decisions:- 1. Premraj and Ganpatraj and Company P. Ltd., v. Asst. Collector of Customs ....