Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Reassessment Quashed: No New Evidence Justifying Reopening u/s 147 for Share Trading Profits Already Disclosed.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 challenged. Profit earned by trading in shares treated as unexplained credit u/s 68. Held: Petitioner disclosed all material facts including derivatives transactions in books during regular assessment proceedings. Assessing Officer passed order u/s 143(3) assessing total income. Despite profit from transactions being offered to tax in return, reopening initiated based on information received. However, Assessing Officer failed to correlate information with records and material already scrutinized during regular assessment. Petitioner provided all information, disclosing material facts fully. Reopening notice without jurisdiction, contrary to provisions, as no fresh tangible material for reasonable belief of escaped income. Mere change of opinion on profit already offered to tax. Decided in favor of assessee. Impugned notice quashed and set aside.....