Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2013 (9) TMI 1304

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e same in accordance with law. The High Court felt that if an appeal is preferred against an order of supersession before the School Tribunal Under Section 9(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the MEPS Act'), the provisions of limitation do not apply to such appeals and accordingly remanded the matter before the School Tribunal. 3. The Appellant being aggrieved by the said order has preferred this appeal. 4. The facts of the case are as follows: 4.1. On August 16, 1996 the Appellant was appointed as the Headmaster of Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Vidhyalaya run by Jijamata Shikshan Prasarak Mandal. Then Respondent No. 1 was acting as the in-charge H....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n August 14, 1996. 4.3. The School Tribunal duly considered the matter on merits and noticed that Respondent No. 1 himself presided over the meeting of the Managing Committee and approved the appointment of the present Appellant as Headmaster of the said School. Admittedly, the Appellant was working since then and the said fact was known to the Respondent No. 1. Admittedly, he did not apply before the appropriate authority for appropriate remedy, save and except he filed representations addressed to R/M. In these circumstances, the School Tribunal refused to condone the delay and dismissed the application. 5. Being aggrieved, a writ petition was filed by Respondent No. 1 before the High Court and the High Court remanded the matter to the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....session to the Tribunal constituted Under Section 8:] Provided that, no such appeal shall lie to the Tribunal in any case where the matter has already been decided by a Court of competent jurisdiction or is pending before such Court, on the appointed date or where the order of dismissal, removal, otherwise termination of service or reduction in rank was passed by the Management at any time before the 1st July, 1976. (2) Such appeal shall be made by the employee to the Tribunal, within thirty days from the date of receipt by him of the order of dismissal, removal otherwise termination of service or reduction in rank, as the case may be. Provided that, where such order was made before the appointed date, such appeal may be made within s....