1979 (8) TMI 65

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ibunal, Delhi Bench D, has referred the following question for the opinion of this court : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and on a proper interpretation of the provisions of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, no gift- tax assessment could be made on the firm? " The facts necessary for answering the question are short: The assessee manufactures crystal sugar by the sulp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ax could be levied under s. 3 of the Act. Thus, the only question that falls for consideration is as to whether a gift made by a firm is liable to be taxed under s. 3. Section 3 makes all gifts chargeable to tax from the 1st day of April, 1958, made by a person during the previous year, at the rate specified in the Schedule to the Act. The word "person " has been defined in s. 2 (xviii) of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eparate legal entity, under the general law, but is the collective name of a body of persons, who have entered into a partnership. This being so, a firm would fall within the category " body of individuals or persons whether incorporated or not " as contained in the later part of s. 2(xviii). In the case of M. M. Ipoh v. CIT [1968] 67 ITR 106, the Supreme Court interpreting the definition of the w....