Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 1263

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng machinery and spares falling under Chapter 84 of CETA, 1985. On scrutiny of their records, it was noticed that they had taken credit of service tax paid on various inadmissible services during the period from April 2010 to March 2012. As the said services were not related to the manufacture of final products, Show Cause Notice dated 23.8.2012 was issued proposing to disallow and recover the credit of Rs.4,03,207/- under sec. 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 along with interest and to impose equal penalty. After due process of law, the original authority reduced the demand to Rs.2,81,742/- with interest and equal penalty. Appellant preferred appeal before the first appellate authority who after going through the records further reduced....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e integrally connected with the ultimate production of goods. Sl. No Particulars Amount involved (Rs) 1 Accommodation services provided to Engineers 442 2 Brand Promotion 41,556 3 Modification and partition work of office space inside the factory area 9,484 4 Roofing work for factory sheds in order to maintain the temperature 11,593 5 Employees reimbursement of expenses 2,035 6 Aluminium partition work inside the factory for the supervisors 1,09,774 7 Service charges for copier machines inside the factory 325 8 Electrical work inside the factory area 8,549 9 Forex consultancy services 9,270 10 Services related to Banking 66,950 11 AMC relating to bio metric time recorder installed inside the factory 2,936....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the Appellant does not have an "intention to evade tax" and therefore extended period of limitation cannot be invoked against the Appellant. She stated that the demand and penalties against the appellants cannot be sustained and prayed that further proceedings in the matter be dropped. 3.2 The learned Authorized Representative for the respondent, reiterated the points given in the impugned order and prayed that the appeal may be rejected. 4. Heard the rival parties I find that the expression "activities in or in relation to manufacture" postulates activities which are integrally connected to the manufacture of the goods. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex Pune III- 2009 (15) S.T.R. 657 (Bom.....