Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 1233

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) in ITA No. 232/Kol/2021 for the assessment year 2009-10. 2. The revenue has raised the following substantial questions of law for consideration : a) Whether the Learned Tribunal has committed substantial error in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 11,07,50,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, relying upon only on the paper submissions made by the assessee, without considering the point of law that when any credit in the particular book of account is a fresh credit and the assessee is required to establish the identity, creditworthiness of shareholders and the genuineness of transaction, which the assessee failed to do? b) Whether the Learne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r. Soumen Bhattacharjee, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr. J.P. Khaitan, learned senior advocate assisted by Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee. 4. The revenue is aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Tribunal affirming the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 5, Kolkata [CIT(A)] dated 14th September, 2020 by which the addition made by the assessing officer stood deleted. The matter arises under Section 68 of the Act and the revenue is on appeal before us largely on the ground that the order passed by the Tribunal is not a speaking order and the factual position has not been discussed by the learned Tribunal. 5. Further, it is....