Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 1064

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HAMAN For the Petitioner: By Adv C.A. Jojo For the Respondents: Sri. Christopher Abraham, Sri. P.R. Ajithkumar - SC JUDGMENT The petitioner Society is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'). Against Ext. P1 order of assessment passed by the 1st respondent under Section 143(3) of the Act, the petitioner preferred Ext. P3 appeal before the 2nd respondent along with E....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of existence of reasonable cause and also in the absence of proper explanation and reasons, without being supported by proper evidence, the appeal filed by the assessee late by 18 days, the delay is not condonable. Hence, the appeal of the assessee I not admitted and the same is dismissed in limine." 2. Ext.P4 is the petition to condone the delay in filing Ext.P3 appeal, wherein it is stated a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....delay of 14 days in filing the appeal." On going through the reason stated in Ext. P4, I find that the petitioner has stated sufficient reason in the application for condonation of delay. 3. The 2nd respondent has taken technical view in dismissing the application to condone the delay and in consequently dismissing the appeal. The 2nd respondent went wrong in dismissing the appeal at the thresh....