Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 1062

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R KUL BHARAT, JM : The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by Ld.CIT(A)/ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Pune dated 19.01.2024 for the Assessment Year ("AY") 2018-19. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- 1. "That the order passed by Addl/JCIT(A) is illegal, arbitrary and without proper appreciation of facts and opportunity to the assessee. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sions of section 10(38). (iv) That a mere mistake in ITR cannot result in taxation of income which is expressly exempt under the provision of the Income tax Act, 1961 and as such the observation of AddI/JCIT(A) regarding non-filing of revised return is misconceived and irrational. (v) That the order passed by the Addl/JCIT(A) is inconsistent with CBDT Circular No. 14(XL-35), date....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessee while filing the return of income due to oversight, made a mistake in choosing the group for exempt capital gain amounting to INR 23,44,048/-. The CPC processed ITR and issued intimation order u/s 143 of the Act, after making adjustment of INR 23,44,048/- under the head income from business and profession. Thus, as per assessee, the capital gain which is otherwise exempt was taxed erron....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... seeking condonation u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act, would not arise. The Ld.CIT(A) therefore, misdirected itself in not considering the fact that the gains arising out of sale of equity oriented mutual fund being exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act. 7. On the other hand, Ld. Sr. DR for the Revenue opposed these submissions and supported the orders of the authorities below. He submitted that the assessee ca....