Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

CESTAT ruled that if goods aren't liable for confiscation under Customs Act 1962, penalty can't be imposed under u/s 112.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The case involved the scope for retention of penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act, 1962 after liability to confiscation was set aside. Confiscation pertains to goods, while penalty is on persons. Customs Act does not allow separate confiscation for individuals. The show cause notice alleged goods liable for confiscation u/s 111(o). Penalty u/s 112 applies only if a person contributed to the confiscation. Without confiscation, penalty cannot be imposed. Appeal allowed, nothing remains against the two individuals.....