Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

CESTAT ruled appellant provided Legal Consultancy service, not Business Auxiliary Service. Service recipient not liable for service tax.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the issue of classifying services as either business auxiliary or legal services. The appellant provided Legal Consultancy service related to labor law, potentially falling under legal services or Manpower Supply Service. The lower authorities failed to properly assess facts and evidence. The claim that the service recipient paid service tax was dismissed based on incomplete verification. The appellant cannot be doubly liable for service tax if the recipient has already paid. The case was remanded for further review by the Adjudicating Authority.....