Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 651

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....has raised the following grounds of appeal :- "1. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the appellant's case, the Hon' CIT(A) has erred in upholding the disallowance made aby the Ld. AO in disallowing the deduction u/s. 10AA. 2. In law and in the facts and circumstances of the appellant's case, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the levy of interest u/s. 234(a), 234(b), 234(c), 234(d)." 3. The assessee company filed its return of income for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2012-13 on 26.09.2012 declaring Nil income. The case was selected for scrutiny and order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was passed accepting the returned income. The PCIT passed order under Section 263 of the Act on 22.03.2017 setti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was passed Pgs. 8-10 19.12.2017 Show cause notice was issued by AO Pg. 11 20.12.2017 Reply to show cause notice was furnished Pgs. 12-13 20.12.2017 Assessment Order was passed by AO -- 7. The Ld. AR further submitted that Form 56F was obtained before filing the return of income but the same was not filed along with return of income. The Ld. AR further submitted that Form 56F was later filed before the PCIT during revisionary proceedings and, therefore, the Assessing Officer at this juncture cannot decide the matter only on the ground that the Audit Repot/Form 56F was not filed along with return of income as the same is belatedly filed and, therefore, deduction claimed under Section 10A of the Act was rejecte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) - CIT vs. Mayur Foundation - 274 ITR 562 (Guj) 8. The Ld. AR further submitted that the requirement of e-filing of Form 56F became mandatory at a later stage as contemplated in proviso to Rule 12(2) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Upto 31.03.2013, audit report only under Section 44AB, 92E or 115JB were to be filed electronically. W.e.f. 01.04.2013, scope of relevant sections for Audit Report in the said proviso was explained by inserting few more Sections as noted/ mentioned in Section 10AA did not find place in those Sections. W.e.f. 01.04.2014, legislature inserted Section 10AA in the said proviso i.e. w.e.f. 01.04.2014, even audit report under Section 10AA is to be filed electronically. Thus, requirement of filing Audit Repo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee which is contrary to its own conduct and, therefore, as contemplated by various case laws, cited by the CIT(A) in paragraph no. 4.3.2 as well as the Tribunal's decision in case of Mahendra Kumar Damani vs. ACIT, the same has to be taken into cognisance and the CIT(A) has rightly dismissed the appeal. 10. We have heard both the parties and perused all the relevant material available on record. It is pertinent to note that the decision quoted by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of PCIT vs. Wipro (2022) 288 taxmann.com 491 though held that since the assessee did not file the Audit Report in Form No.56F, as required under law, the Assessing Officer was right in disallowing the deduction claimed under Section 10AA of the Act as it is a ma....