Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

High Court ruled that importer evaded duty on over Rs. 50 Lakhs worth of gold, not exported as required. No bail granted.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The High Court considered jurisdiction for Anticipatory Bail Applications, extension of export obligation period, duty evasion, and confiscation of gold worth over Rs. 50 Lakhs. The importer failed to export processed articles within the specified period. Statements revealed discrepancies in gold processing and export. 37 kgs of imported gold went missing, indicating possible misappropriation. Duty payment and confiscation under u/s 111 (o) of Customs Act were warranted. Custodial interrogation of Applicants was deemed necessary due to seriousness of offense. Protection u/s 438 of Cr.P.C. was denied, and the Application was dismissed.....