Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Validity of assessment proceedings u/s 144C challenged - extended period not applicable without TPO reference. Assessment order barred by limitation.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of assessment proceedings u/s 144C, focusing on the period of limitation. The assessee argued that u/s 153(4), an extended 12-month period for assessment completion applies only when a reference u/s 92CA(1) is made to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) during assessment or re-assessment. The Tribunal agreed, noting that the extended time limit is not available for Non-Resident assessments u/s 144C. As the assessment notice was issued on 30.03.2021, the assessment should have been completed by 31/03/2022. Since the final assessment order was passed on 12.01.2023, it was deemed barred by limitation. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal.....