TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Procedural Compliance vs. Substantive Justice: Balancing Procedural Rigidity and Transitional Hardships in Section 80G Approvals
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai, in the case involving multiple assessees challenging the rejection of their applications for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals arise from orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [CIT(E)], Chennai. This case highlights the procedural and substantive issues surrounding the approval process for char....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iling requirements. * Nature of the Provisions: The appellants posited that the timelines under clause (iii) to the proviso to section 80G(5) should be considered directory rather than mandatory, especially given the transitional nature of the amendments and the intent to facilitate smooth compliance. * Substantive Compliance: They argued that their applications substantively complied with....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ural timelines was crucial to maintaining the integrity of the tax system. * Categorization of Trusts: The respondent distinguished between new trusts and old trusts applying for registration under the new regime, arguing that the same stringent timeline should apply uniformly to ensure consistent application of the law. Court's Analysis The ITAT, Chennai, examined the arguments presente....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... light of the transitional amendments. The ITAT noted that procedural provisions should be interpreted to facilitate justice rather than hinder it. * Remand for Merits Consideration: The ITAT set aside the orders of the CIT(E) rejecting the applications for being time-barred. The tribunal remanded the cases back to the CIT(E) for reconsideration on merits, directing that the applications be ev....