2024 (5) TMI 1306

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ana, Ms. Hemlata Rawat & Mr. Chetan Kumar Shukla, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Ansari, Senior Panel Counsel for R-1 Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Suhani Mathur, Mr. Ashok Kumar Dagar, Ms. Pallavi Gupta, Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma & Mr. Y.K. Parashar, Advocates JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 27.04.2024, whereby Sh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Petitioner is that the Petitioner has availed excess Input Tax Credit. He submits that the comparison of GSTR-2A with GSTR-3B filed by the Petitioner clearly shows that there is no excess claim of Input Tax Credit. On the other hand, it reveals that Petitioner has claimed less credit than what was available to the Petitioner in the relevant financial years. 4. Issue notice. Notice is accepted ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tailed documents and we have limited data for review. We have not reviewed any invoices or sale register, we have reviewed the following details for April 2018 to March 2019 as provided by the department:- a) Consol GSTR-1 b) Consol GSTR-3B c) Monthly GSTR-2A d) Form-9 e) Form-9C From the above observation of the auditor who has conducted the special audit it is clear that the taxp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x /Interest amount already confirmed through SCN/ DRC-01 (Copy attached) in accordance with the provisions of CGST / DGST Act & Rules, 2017." The Proper Officer has opined that the reply was not substantial to counter the observation of the auditor. 6. The observation in the impugned order dated 27.04.2024 is not sustainable for the reasons that the reply filed by the Petitioner is a detailed rep....