Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (5) TMI 1273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he case are that the appellants are issued with show-cause notice along with M/s. Ghataprabha Sahakari Sakkare Karakhane Niyamit on 23.06.2009 alleging that the noticee company has failed to discharge duty within the due date as prescribed under Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The main noticee M/s. Ghataprabha Sahakari Sakkare Karakhane Niyamit has paid the duty along with interest without utilising the cenvat credit in terms of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 during the period June 2008 to February 2009. The said show-cause notice was adjudicated and the demand issued in the notice was confirmed and the appellants were visited with personal penalty of Rs.2.00 lakhs (appeal No.E/310/2010), Rs.10.00 lakhs (appeal No.E/311/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lms Private Limited & others(supra). After analysing the relevant provisions, this Tribunal observed as follows:- 7. Heard both sides and perused the records of the case. The case of the Department is that the appellants have not made the declaration as required under the SVLDR Scheme; Department relies on Section 125 of the Finance Act, 2019 and Rule 3 of the Rules made under the Scheme and submits that declaration is to be submitted case-wise and therefore, each of the appellants require to file a declaration and therefore, there is no automatic immunity to the conoticees when the main noticee settles the duty and penalty under the Scheme. 8. Rule 3 of the Rules made under the Scheme is as follows: 3. Form of de....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... paid or is nil, then, the entire amount of late fee or penalty; ---- 10. It is clear from the provision of Section 124 that the applicants are eligible for relief of entire penalty or late fee. Now the question arises as to whether the immunity or relief is automatic or is consequent upon the declaration required to be filed by the assessees. The statutory provisions indicate that the appellants are eligible for relief for the entire amount of penalty or late fee. The relief is not subject to the satisfaction of the committee constituted for operationalization of the Scheme as in the case of settlement of duty. Had the appellants filed declarations, the said committee had no role but to give relief as contained in Section 124. Thu....