2024 (5) TMI 412

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ellant Shri Ajay Kumar Samota, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent ORDER In this appeal the appellant has challenged the personal penalty imposed under Rule 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The penalty was imposed on the charge of abating the evasion of duty by M/s. Phenix Construction Technologies. 2. Shri Vipul Khandhar, Learned Chartered Accountant submits that the main party's c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Technologies and the case of M/s. Phenix Construction Technologies has been settled under SVLDRS-2019 and the appeal was disposed of by this Tribunal vide order dated 10.06.2021, hence, the personal penalty of the appellant is not sustainable in the light of the following judgments:- * Shri V.K. Aggarwal and Shri J.K. Aggarwal v. CCE, New Delhi - 2023 (9) TMI 178 - CESTAT NEW DELHI * M/s. Sie....