Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (5) TMI 127

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....thered that the appellant is not discharging Service Tax under this category as well as on other services, even though consideration was received by them, the Department conducted investigation. It was noticed that the appellant had rented immovable property to M/s. Siesta Hospitality Limited (SHSL) and had not paid the service tax during the period from April 2010 to March 2012 on the rental amount received by them. So also, they had not discharged Service Tax on the consideration received by them from M/s. Ascott (Mauritius) for selling the shares pursuant to joint venture entered between the appellant and M/s. Ascott (Mauritius). Further, the appellant had not discharged appropriate service tax on Management, Maintenance and Repair servi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f guest rooms/accommodation. 3. In regard to the demand raised under Business Auxiliary Services, the Ld. Counsel adverted to the discussions made by the Adjudicating Authority in Paragraph 7.6 of the impugned order. It is explained by the Ld. Counsel that the appellant had transferred a percentage of their holding to their joint venture partner, M/s. Ascott (Mauritius). The transaction was in the nature of sale of shares. There is no service provided. The appellant had not conducted promotion of business of the purchaser of the shares. It is submitted that the very same issue was considered by the Tribunal in the appellant's own case vide Final Order No. 42305/2018 dated 27.08.2018. The Tribunal had set aside the demand observing th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... agriculture, aquaculture, farming, forestry, animal husbandry, mining purposes; (b) vacant land, whether or not having facilities clearly incidental to the use of such vacant land; (c) land used for educational, sports, circus, entertainment and parking purposes; and (d) building used solely for residential purposes and buildings used for the purposes of accommodation, including hotels, hostels, boarding houses, holiday accommodation, tents, camping facilities. Explanation 2.-For the purposes of this sub-clause, an immovable property partly for use in the course or furtherance of business or commerce and partly for residential or any other purposes shall be deemed to be immovable property for use in the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t's own case had considered the very same issue and held that the demand cannot sustain as there is no provision of services. The relevant part of the Final Order reads as under:- "(iii) The department has demanded service tax under "Business Auxiliary Service" for sale of shares by appellants to M/s. Rattha Ciadels OMR Apart Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Here again, the appellants have paid Income-tax on the profit under Capital Gains under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The amount received has been booked as a Profit on Sale of Shares, in their books of accounts. The main ground for alleging that the transaction would fall within the "Business Auxiliary Service" is that the shares of face value of Rs.10/- has been sold by the appellant at a pre....