Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1955 (10) TMI 52

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r on the ground that the appellant was guilty of waste and a fraudulent design to convert and secrete the assets, a greater part of which consisted of outstandings and movables. The defendant-appellant denied having committed any waste or other injurious acts. She also denied any fraudulent design on her part to convert or secrete the assets. The learned Subordinate Judge found on Issue No. 1 that the defendant has not been proved to be guilty of waste or other acts injurious to the reversion, but on Issue No. 2, he held that apart from proof of acts of waste, on the facts of the case, there was sufficient justification for the appointment of a receiver to safeguard the interests of the reversioners. 2. The properties of Vaithianatha Ayyar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the estate. Similarly, Sundaram Pillai, as receiver of the business, was directed to file into Court within two weeks from the date of the decree, a report disclosing in full and in detail the stock-in-trade and assets belonging to the business. The defendant appeals against the decree of the learned Subordinate Judge. 3. On the findings arrived at by the learned Subordinate Judge, which were not in any way canvassed before us, it appears to us that an appointment of a receiver was not called for. The learned Judge rightly quotes a relevant passage from Mayne's Hindu Law, nth Edition, page 305. But apparently he has overlooked the principles stated therein. In that passage we find the following: Though no specific acts of waste or m....