TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (4) TMI 751
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....kata in ITA No. 473/Kol/2019 for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. The revenue has raised the following substantial questions of law for consideration :- a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 4,78,50,000/- under Section 68 of the Act on account of share capital and premium in the course of assessment in absence of identity of the creditors, genuineness and creditworthiness of the entire transaction ? b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was erred in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 4,78,50,000/- made by the Assessing Officer where no personal attendance was....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... prove anyone of the three ingredients which are required to be proved under Section 68 of the Act. Several decisions were referred to and the Assessing Officer concludes that there was no documents produced by the assessee to substantiate their claim. 5. This order was affirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9 [CIT(A)] by order dated 21st January, 2019 holding that merely furnishing documents in a routine way does not explain the source of creditworthiness of the party. Further, it has been held that the basis on which premium has been charged for the shares has not been explained; no efforts have been made with the help of financial statements to justify the quantum of share premium charged. The CIT(A) placed reliance on the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of resources of the share subscribers and if the assessee was serious enough to establish his case, it ought to have complied with the notices/letters issued by the Assessing Officer and ought to have produced the directors of the subscribing companies before the Assessing Officer so that they could explain the sources from which the share subscription was made. It is stated that there is no complaints either from the end of the assessee company or from the end of the alleged subscriber company. This finding recorded by the Assessing Officer as affirmed by the CIT(A), if required to be set aside by the learned Tribunal, reasons have to be assigned. Therefore, we find that the conclusion arrived at by the learned Tribunal in paragraph 11 is ....