Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (4) TMI 248

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... operative part of this order is as follows : a) The quantity of Iron Ore particles of size more than 10 mm present in the Exports made under the Shipping Bill No. 312/10-11 covered in the show cause notice are considered as Iron Ore Fines and are correctly classifiable under Tariff item No. 26011130. Hence, I drop the demand of Rs. 7,21,149/- demanded on account of classification of goods as Iron Ore Lumps. b) In terms of Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962, I finalise the provisional assessment of the said Shipping Bills as detailed at para 23 above, and demand Customs duty of Rs. 8,16,059/- (Rupees Eight LakhsSixteen Thousand and Fifty Nine only) from M/s Terapanth Foods Ltd. c) I demand interest at applicable rates on the amounts mentioned at (b) above, under Section 18(3) of the Customs Act, 1962. d) I confirm the demand of Customs Duty of Rs. 19,06,508 (Rupees Nineteen Lakhs Six Thousand Five Hundred and Eight only) being the export duty short paid in respect of Shipping Bill No. 312/10-11 in terms of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, by adopting the actual transaction value of the said goods, in terms of Rule 3(1) of the Customs Valuati....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....able documentary LOC payable at site issued from a prime International Bank. Article 11 of the Contract provided - CIQ to inspect the commodity for Quantity and Quality at place of discharging port and the CIQ (lab) result at the discharge port shall be final and binding on both the parties. As per Article 14B weighing was to be done at discharging port and as per Article 15 weight and moisture content was to be determined by CIQ. The weight thus, determined shall be basis for final invoice. Article 15 also provided the percentage of moisture loss at the time of loading and discharge will be ascertained at 105 cg. It also provided for adjustment of the price based on the Fe content and the impurities based on the test report of a testing agency viz., CIQ, China. CFR (also known as C&F) is one of the standard agreements of trade where the price includes the cost of the goods as well as the cost of the freight upto the port indicated therein, but not the transit insurance. 5. Appellants filed Shipping Bill No. 312/2010-11 for quantity of 49000 WMT. Appellants paid customs duty of Rs. 94,86,065/- and provisional assessment was done after Appellants furnished the provisional duty bo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ulal Singhvi, Director of the Appellants which is not relied upon documents (ii) Appellants are entitled for refund (iii) After negotiation price 114 USD PDMT CRF was arrived at by giving discount that there was nothing wrong in negotiating the price when the buyer demanded such discount and therefore USD 114 PDMT is the transaction value. (iv) Appellants have not received anything in excess of USD 114 from the buyer. (v) As per Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962, the value of exports goods shall be the transaction value i.e. price actually paid or payable for the goods when sold for export from India for delivery at the time and place of exportation. Further, as per the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Export Goods), Rules, 2007 the value of export goods shall be transaction value. (vi) No such exercise about transaction value of goods of like kind and quality has been made as required under Rule 4. Appellants relied upon this Tribunal judgment in the case of CC(Export), Goa, Vs VGM Exports reported in [2013 (291) ELT 572 (Tri-Mum)]. (vii) That the declared value of USD 114 is supported by contract entered with M/s Swi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n'ble Tribunal in the case of Alpine International Vs CC, Mangalore reported in [2008 (224) ELT 331 (Tri-Bang)] and in the case of Taurion Iron & Steel Co. Pvt Ltd., Vs CCE, Visakhapatnam [2009 (241) ELT 390 (Tri-Bang)] wherein the chemical examiner test report was ignored as against the other test reports submitted. (vii) For including 3.5% lumps, reliance is placed on CIQ report on FE content as certified by CIQ, report is ignored and therefore the Department cannot pick and choose the contents of any test report. 12. The Learned Commissioner passed impugned Order-in- Original confirming the demand and imposing penalties as aforementioned. 13. Being aggrieved, the appellants are in appeal interalia on the following grounds: 13.1 The Ld. Commissioner in Para 22.1, has erred in taking moisture content of iron ore as per the chemical laboratory report to arrive at dry weight of iron ore inspite of Article 14 and 15 in the contract entered with the buyer which categorically provided that for determination of moisture content and consequently iron ore content testing has to be at 105 Degree C. And the final Dry weight shall be calculated by deducting the final free m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the buyer has retained the amount @ 16 USD per tonne as compensation for earlier exports made by the appellant and there was dispute between the parties with regard to quality and final price. The reduction in price is not due to any discount but only a payment made by the seller to the buyer for an earlier shipment made by them by way of settlement of dispute. The Adjudicating Authority have erred in holding that this amount was payable for the present consignment but adjusted for previous consignment, shall be treated as amount payable for the present consignment and the transaction value shall include the suppressed value of Rs. 3,81,30,160/-. 15. It is further urged that Shri Babulal Singhvi, appellant had stated in his statement dated 03.01.2013 that contract dated 16.06.2010 is for USD 114 PDMT for the entire cargo. The said amount of USD 16 was by way of compensation for quality issue against the previous export consignment to the same buyer made by vessel M.V. Nava Eliza. The buyer had demanded compensation USD 20 PDMT, but the same was negotiated and settled at USD 16 PDMT which was adjusted by using the price of the present export cargo despatched vide M.V. Alcyone,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vi, Director, to the extent of USD 10 PDMT by way of compensation to the overseas buyers for previous consignment. In view of the facts, suppression of correct transaction value be upheld. Accordingly, the impugned order may be upheld and the appeals to be dismissed. 20. Learned AR further submits that the cost of freight and transit insurance are not part of transaction value at the port of export (in India) it includes only FOB (Freight on Board) value. This is the value for the purpose of Section 14 and export duty must be calculated on this FOB value. He further urges that the lab report of CRCL will prevail over the lab report at discharge port of the mutually agreed lab fixed by the parties. He further relies on the ruling of Hira Steel Ltd., [2017 (1) TMI 11- CESTAT, Mumbai] wherein it have been held that "departmental laboratory report, unless challenged, has to be accepted as true and correct". 21. The two questions to be answered by us in this case are: a) Can the transaction value between the buyer and seller be modified by the Customs based on the test report of the chemical examiner of CRCL when the price should be finalised as per the test report of CIQ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lso reflected in the respective valuation Rules which fully align with Section 14. Rule 3 and 10 of the Import Valuation Rules deal with the issue and relevant portions of which reads as follows: Rule 3. Determination of the method of valuation. - (1) Subject to rule 12, the value of imported goods shall be the transaction value adjusted in accordance with provisions of rule 10; (2) .. (3) .. (4) if the value cannot be determined under the provisions of sub-rule (1), the value shall be determined by proceeding sequentially through rule 4 to 9. Rule 10. Cost and services . - (1) In determining the transaction value, there shall be added to the price actually paid or payable for the imported goods, - (a) the following to the extent they are incurred by the buyer but are not included in the price actually paid or payable for the imported goods, namely:- (i) commissions and brokerage, except buying commissions; (ii) the cost of containers which are treated as being one for customs purposes with the goods in question; (iii) the cost of packing whether for labour or materials; ........