Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (1) TMI 1426

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8,45,110/- to the petitioner company, which are the amounts collected from the petitioners as stamp duty on Bills of Entry filed for the goods imported by them; (B) That Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the Respondents Nos. 1, 2 and 3 herein to pay to the petitioners interest @ 9% per annum (or at the rate that may be deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court) on the amounts of Rs. 2,48,45,110/- collected as stamp duty from the petitioners, for the period when the amounts were collected from the petitioners till actual refund/restitution thereof; (C) Pending hearing and final disposal of the present petition, Your Lordships may be pleas....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... vs. State of Gujarat, Special Civil Application No. 14819 of 2020, decided on 23.12.2020. 4. It appears that despite the aforesaid position of law, the writ applicants were compelled to deposit an amount of Rs. 2,48,45,110/- towards stamp duty on the bills of entry. The respondent No. 1 herein, the Superintendent of Stamps, Gandhinagar, owes an explanation in what circumstances, despite the settled position of law, the writ applicants were asked to pay the stamp duty on the bills of entry. 5. Let Notice be issued to the respondents, returnable on 12.01.2022. 6. On the returnable date, notify this matter on top of the Board." 3. We have heard Mr. Dave, the learned counsel appearing for the writ-applicants and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... which the goods are classifiable etc. and [iv] 'Bill of Lading' or delivery order etc. But all of such documents will not be an instrument of delivery order for the purpose of Entry 24. The question whether 'bill of lading' is delivery order which is mentioned in one of the documents to be produced along with 'bill of entry' is not required to be answered in the present case, as admittedly, stamp duty is not charged on 'bill of lading' in view of exclusion under Sec. 2[l] of the Bombay Stamp Act. However, one cannot ignore the document to be produced along with the 'bill of entry' [Form Nos. 22 and 23 of Bill of Entry [Forms] Regulations, 1976], where under at sr. no. 5, it has been mentioned: 'b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g signed on behalf of the owner of the ship in which goods are embarked acknowledging the receipt of the goods and undertaking to deliver them at the end of the voyage subject to such conditions as may be mentioned in the bill of lading. Therefore, it will be clear that 'bill of lading' is a delivery order. Finding of the learned Single Judge that 'bill of lading' is not a delivery order being erroneous, we hereby set aside such finding at para-10.1 of the judgment. 83. At paras 13.4 and 14 of the impugned judgment, the learned Single Judge held that if the goods are transferred to a third person and the names in the 'bill of lading' and 'bill of entry' are different, the Circular relating to stamp d....