Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (3) TMI 1206

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ficer in the Assessment Order dated 23.01.2021. 2. The petitioner had filed a regular return under Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 04.03.2019 for Assessment Year 2018-19. A notice dated 28.09.2019 was thereafter issued to the petitioner under Section 143(2) read with Section 143(3A) and Section 143(3B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was specifically stated that the said notice was being issued only for a limited scrutiny of "Agricultural Income" of the petitioner. The petitioner appears to have replied to the above notice. Thereafter, a scrutiny assessment order dated 23.01.2021 was passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. It is submitted that only information that was called for from the petitioner was rega....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....itted that power to rectify an order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is confined only to "error apparent on the face on records" or when there were clerical mistakes. It is submitted that there is no error apparent on the face on records in the scrutiny Assessment Order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 23.01.2021. 6. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the following decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court:- i. T.S.Balaram, Income Tax Officer vs. Volkart Brothers, (1971) 82 ITR 50 (SC); ii. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Hero Cycles (P) Ltd., (1997) 94 Taxman 271(SC). 7. It is submitted that in this case, there are no jurisdictional facts and therefore the power sought to be exe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Act, 1961, it is submitted that where any matter has been considered and decided in any proceeding by way of appeal or revision relating to an order referred to in sub-section (1), the authority passing such order may, under Sub-section 1(A) to Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, amend the order under that sub-section in relation to any matter other than the matter which has been so considered and decided. 14. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. I have perused the Judgments cited. I have also perused notice issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 28.09.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....come Tax Act, 1961 by including those issues which were not expressly dealt earlier namely (i) Interest on Borrowing, (ii) Goods in Transit & (iii) Interest on account of Excess Refund of amounts. These items were not included in the Assessment Order dated 23.01.2021. 19. Section 154(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 reads as under:- "Rectification of Mistake:- 154.(1) With a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, an income-tax authority referred to in section 116 may,- (a) amend any order passed by it under the provisions of this Act; (b) amend any intimation or deemed intimation under sub-section (1) of section 143; (c) amend any intimation under sub-section (1) of section 200A." 20. Sub-Section (2) to Section 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....upreme Court held that the rectification under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act can only be made when glaring mistake of fact or law has been committed by the officer passing the order comes apparent from the record. The court held rectification is not possible if the question is debatable. The Court however held that the point which was not examined on fact or in law cannot be dealt as mistake apparent on the record. 24. In the case of Maharana Mills Private Limited vs. Income Tax Officer, [1959] 36 ITR 350 (SC), the Hon'ble Supreme Court examined the word "record". It held the word "record" as contemplated by Section 35 of the Income Tax Act, 1922 did not mean only the order of the assessment but it comprises all proceedings on which th....