2018 (2) TMI 2112
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Respondent : Shri Tushar Hemani & P.B. Parmar ORDER PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: 1. With this appeal, the Revenue has challenged the correctness of the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-I, Ahmedabad dated 14.11.2011 pertaining to A.Y. 2009-10. 2. The only grievance of the revenue is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,27,86,693/- made on account of peak of nega....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the course of the search operation itself, the assessee and his brothers explained the negative cash position and the utilization and accordingly offered undisclosed income of Rs. 282.91 lacs. 6. The contention of the assessee did not find any favour with the A.O. who completed the assessment proceedings by making addition of Rs. 2,27,86,693/- as further undisclosed investment. 7. Assessee ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (i) FDRs in the name of "Sansudha Vinimay Pvt. Ltd." Rs. 1,49,85,000/- (ii) Excess Stock Rs. 57,50,750/- (iii) Receivables Rs. 20,64,250/- (iv)Jewellery Rs. 12,56,888/- Total Rs. 24056888/- 11. During the course of search, when negative cash balance of Rs. 2,27,86,693/- was confronted to the assessee, the partner explained that such negative balance was on a....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI