Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (3) TMI 909

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t : N.C.Mishra, Abhishek Mishra, Chandra Has Mishra, Ramesh Chandra Mishra For the Opposite Party : C.S.C. ORDER HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard Sri Abhishek Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist, and Sri Sanjay Sareen, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. There is consensus between the parties that the matter in issue in both....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....competent authority under the provisions of Section 28 of the U.P. Value Added Tax, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 2008') per which the revisionist was assessed to tax at the rate of Rs.68,87,500/- and after adjustment of ITC claim the amount was reduced to Rs.68,66,173/-. Being aggrieved, the revisionist filed first appeal, which was partly allowed by the appellate authority v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espect to bill no. 107 dated 01.01.2008 and bill no.121 dated 30.01.2008 of which all three copies are available in the bill book as per the list of sales produced before the Tax Assessing Authority, and (c) that no opportunity of hearing has been accorded to the revisionist at any stage by the authorities. 8. So far as the first ground is concerned namely that the revisionist was having three ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....et he had indicated the said sale in the list of sales, no denial to the said finding has been given by the revisionist while filing the instant revision of the said sales being indicated in the list of sales produced before the Assessing Authority. As such, the said ground is rejected. 10. So far as ground (c) is concerned that no opportunity of hearing has been accorded to the revisionist, th....