Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 1443

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) For the Appellant : None. For the Respondent : Mr. P. Saravana Perumal, AR. ORDER PER: D.M MISRA This appeal is filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 94/2010 dated 16/02/2010 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Mangalore. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellants are manufacturers of P&P Medicines falling under Chapter Sub Heading 3003.10.00 of Ce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en Lakhs Thirty Five Thousand One Hundred and Sixty Seven only) with interest and proposal for penalty. On adjudication demands were confirmed. Aggrieved by the said order, they filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The learned Commissioner (Appeals) partly allowed all the appeals on limitation by setting aside the demand for the period 08/01/2005 to 31/03/2007 upholding the confirmation....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE, Bangalore vide Final Order No. 20687/2023 dated 14/07/2023. He submits that the Tribunal taking note of the principle of law settled by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C.Ex. Ahmedabad-II 2008 (232) E.L.T. 245 (Tri.-LB) and Hon'ble Supreme Court in Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. & Cus., Daman - 2011 (263)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...."41. Now coming to the valuation of the physician samples for the purpose of levy of excise duty, in our view, this issue need not detain us long in view of the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/s. Bal Pharma [Civil Appeal No. 1697 of 2006] [2010 (259) E.L.T. 10 (S.C.)]. This Court has upheld the conclusion of the Tribunal that the physician's samples have t....