Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (9) TMI 1445

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Y JUDGMENT (PER HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY) The present appeal has been filed under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the "Act") assailing the order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench-B, Hyderabad (for short "Tribunal") in ITA No. 1081/Hyd/03, dated 03.08.2007 for the Assessment Year 2003-04. Vide impugned order, the order preferred by the appellant stood reje....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d permitted the authorities in India to receive sums without deduction of income tax as is required under Section 195(1) of the Act. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that in spite of specific certificate have not been issued under Section 195(3) of the Act by the Joint Director of the Department, the authorities concerned have made the remittances after deduction of tax at source in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) of the Act, which appellant had availed and which was also granted by the respondent, but when it came for deduction, they had made the remittances only after deduction of TDS was made. 6. Perusal of the pleadings would go to show that the appellant had been all along taking this stand both before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and before the Tribunal that they are not liable to make ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ould be that the entire remittances that have been made to M/s. IGTL Solutions (USA) would be non-taxable so far as TDS is concerned. Further, if the contents of the said letter stands accepted, then the action on the part of the respondent in carrying out deduction at source on the remittances made to M/s. IGTL Solutions (USA) would be per se bad. 8. In view of the aforesaid factual matrix of th....