Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1979 (4) TMI 5

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... registered firm carrying on business of executing contracts and works on behalf of the Government. During the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1972-73, the assessee derived income from one such contract with the M.E.S. department. The ITO computed the assessee's income from the contract on estimate basis after rejecting his account books. He estimated the income at 12 1/2% on an ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and not to the cash receipts only. It further held that the rate of profit ought reasonably be fixed at 9% and not 1% as held by the AAC. At the instance of the assessee, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law for our opinion: " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the rate of profit should be applied to the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the Tribunal was not justified in holding that the cost of material supplied by the M.E.S. was liable to be included in computing the profits from the contract in the present case. But the same cannot be said to be true about the deposits retained by the M.E.S. dept. Even the learned counsel for the petitioner conceded that the same were liable to be included in the total receipts for the pu....