Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (3) TMI 575

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari For the Petitioner : Shri Ashish Goyal, Learned Counsel For the Respondents : Ms Veena Mandlik, Learned Counsel ORDER Heard, finally with the consent of both the parties. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the notice dated 30.03.2021 issued in case No. ITBA/AST/S/148/2021-21/1031903099(1) u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....petitioner contended that respondents could not have issued notice u/s. 148A(b) of the Act since Late Smt. Shakuntala Thakur had died in the year 2017 itself. The said factum of death was very well known to the respondents, therefore, the notice u/s. 148 of the Act of 1961 has been issued in the name of legal heirs of Smt. Shakuntala Devi. It is further submitted that an essential condition to iss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d return in the name of Late Smt. Shakuntala Thakur even after her death. However, it was the sole responsibility of the petitioner to inform about death of the original assessee. The petitioner has filed reply to Sec 148 proceedings before the Assessment Officer. Thereafter, final assessment order has already been passed. Therefore, now at this stage, challenging the show cause notice is inapprop....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nality in view of the assessment order, it is not appropriate for this Court to go into various aspects of the matter and entertain the writ petition, merely because in some other case, the writ petition is pending consideration. " 6. In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case as well as in the light of the judgment passed in the case of Neeraj Mandloi(supra), the present petition....