Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (3) TMI 446

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Excise duty. The activities and processes undertaken by the Respondent are very wide and varied and they are interconnected and inter-dependent for the purpose of achieving the ultimate goal of safe and efficient manufacturing of Iron & Steel products. 2. The Respondent during the process of expansion of its existing unit within the existing factory premises had set up a complete railways network required for catering to the need of the 2.5 MT expansion of the unit. In order to cater to the requirements of production of final dutiable goods, the internal transport of raw material like coal, coke, iron ore, lime stone, etc. as well as of semi-finished goods (from the stage of its receipt in the factory and transfer from one process to anot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case of Steel Authority of India Ltd. (Unit-Bokaro Steel Plant) vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ranchi [2019 (2) TMI 1027 - CESTAT KOLKATA]. He also relies on the decision of Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Cus. & C.Ex., Raipur vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. [2018 (2) TMI 2007 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT]. 6. Heard both sides and perused the appeal papers and the cited case law. 7. We find that this Bench in the case of Appellant's another unit, cited supra, has held as under:- "7. We also find that the above judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been followed by the Tribunal in the following decisions while allowing credit of similar items in dispute. (i) SAIL Vs.Commissioner of Central E....