2024 (3) TMI 333

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. P.K. Gambhir, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Samridhi Vats, Advocate. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 08.08.2023, whereby the GST registration of the petitioner has been cancelled retrospectively with effect from 03.07.2017. Petitioner also impugns Sh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rospectively. Accordingly, the petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of the registration. 5. Thereafter, the impugned order dated 08.08.2023 passed on the Show Cause Notice dated 29.10.2021 does not give any reasons for cancellation of registration. It merely states, "Whereas no reply to the show cause notice has been submitted and whereas, the undersign....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ugned order dated 08.08.2023, it was once again cancelled retrospectively with effect from 03.07.2017 on the ground of "Section 29(2)(c)- Person, other than paying tax u/s 10 failed to furnish returns for prescribed periods". 8. We notice that the impugned Show Cause Notice and the impugned order are also bereft of any details and accordingly the same cannot be sustained. Neither the impugned S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ayer was compliant. 10. It is important to note that, according to the respondent, one of the consequences for cancelling a taxpayer's registration with retrospective effect is that the taxpayer's customers are denied the input tax credit availed in respect of the supplies made by the taxpayer during such period. Although, we do not consider it apposite to examine this aspect but assuming that ....