2024 (3) TMI 288

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....01 of 2021 And WMP Nos. 24843 & 24845 of 2021 - -<br>Service Tax<br>Honourable Mr. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy For the Petitioner : Mr.T.R.Ramesh For the Respondents : Mr.K.Mohanamurali Senior Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner challenges an order dated 29.02.2020 in respect of the application filed by the petitioner under the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Disputes Resolution Scheme-3 (....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... original adjudication took place after 30.06.2019. The present writ petition was filed in the above facts and circumstances. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to paragraph 9 of the order-in-original dated 09.07.2019, and pointed out that it is recorded therein that the hearing was not concluded until after a month beyond 31.05.2019. If the said one month is taken into ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dgment of this Court in Vamsee Overseas Marine Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai (Vamsee Overseas), 2021 (47) G.S.T.L. 463 (Mad.), particularly paragraph 8 thereof. 4. Mr.Mohanamurali, learned senior standing counsel, appears on behalf of the respondents. As regards the contention that the petitioner&#39;s case falls within the category &#39;litigation&#39;, he points out that t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hereafter. While learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the adjudicating authority waited for one month thereafter, the fact that the adjudicating authority waited for one month before issuing orders does not mean that the final hearing took place after 30.06.2019. Hence, the conclusion that the petitioner&#39;s case falls within the category "arrears" and not within the category "liti....