Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (3) TMI 183

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Appellant : Shri A. R. Raghunathan , Consultant For the Respondent : Shri Harendra Singh Pal , Assistant Commissioner / A. R. ORDER Order :- [ Per Ms. SULEKHA BEEVI C. S. ] Brief facts are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture and export of Leather Gloves falling under Chapter 42 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They were utilising the services of Goods Transport Agency (GT....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt proposing to deny the exemption and to demand the Service Tax along with interest and for imposing penalties. After due process of law, the Original Authority confirmed the demand of Rs.4,17,792/- along with interest and imposed penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. On appeal, the Commissioner upheld the same. Hence, this appeal. 2. The Ld. Consultant Shri A.R. Raghunathan appeare....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... prayed that the appeal may be allowed. 3. The Ld. Authorised Representative Shri Harendra Singh Pal appeared and argued for the Department. It is submitted that the appellant had not fulfilled the conditions by furnishing EXP-1 and EXP-2 documents within the prescribed time. The demand confirmed is therefore legal and proper. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The short issue to be considered is whether ....