Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (2) TMI 1336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....facts. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in sustaining the transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 5,81,986/- made by the TPO on account of interest charged on foreign currency loan extended to the Associated Enterprise (AE), Jindal Pipes (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. 3. (1) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred both on facts and in law in sustaining the above adjustment computing the interest at the rate of 6 months LIBOR plus 350 basis points as the Arms' Length rate as against the 1 month LIBOR plus 320 basis points charged by the assessee. (ii) That the above addition has been confirmed by taking the above rate of LIBOR plus 350 basis poin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s declared in the return of income filed by the assessee. 4. The above International transaction of interest received of Rs. 19,88,755/-was benchmarked by the assessee adopting CUP method, being the appropriate method. The assessee has considered JPSPL, its Associated Enterprise as the internal comparable because JPSPL (AE) has also taken the loan from Citibank N.A. Singapore for the tenure of 3 months at the rate of 6 months LIBOR + 225 basis points i.e. 2.937% p.a. approx. and the assessee has charged the higher rate of interest from JPSPL, AE, being 1 month LIBOR + 300 basis points i.e. 3.23% p.a. approx., thus the transaction of the assessee is at arm's length. 5. During the course of Transfer Pricing proceeding, the assessee submitte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5.687 33,59,909.28   22.02.2012 98,39,336.90   39 5.687 59,788.93 Total Interest           34,91,714.36 Arms' Length Interest           34,91,714.36 Less: Interest receied           19,88,755.00 Difference to be adjusted           15,02,959.36 8. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, assessee filed the appeal before CIT(A), who directed to consider LIBOR +350 points, resulting in filing of appeal before the Tribunal. 9. Heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the material available on record. 10. With regard to the tenure of loan granted by Citibank, Singapore being for a period of 3 mo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e fact that two agreements pertains to different financial year, it was submitted that both the transactions pertain to the same period in which LIBOR rates are applied i.e. in 2012. It is noticeable that agreement between JPSPL and Citibank, Singapore pertains to Year 2012 and since the tenure of loan is for a period of 3 months, the interest will be accrued in same calendar year i.e. 2012. On the other hand, with reference to loan agreement between JPSPL and the assessee, it is undisputed that one of the clause in the agreement between assessee and JPSPL reads that interest shall be charged at 1 month LIBOR + 300 basis points as on the last business day of the financial year, in which interest is being accrued. This transaction belongs to....