Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (2) TMI 1314

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....u Trivedi, Advocates Mr. Krishnendu Datta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, Advocates for R - 2 ORDER ( Hybrid Mode ) Heard Shri Abhijeet Sinha, learned senior counsel for the Appellant, Shri Arvind Varma, learned senior counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 and Mr. Krishnendu Datta, learned senior counsel appearing for the Resolution Professional. This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 08.02.2024 by which order the Adjudicating Authority has passed an order in I.A. No.437/MB/2024 in the CIRP process. The Appellant as well as the Respondent No.1 both have submitted their Resolution Plans they being the Resolution Applicants. The Resolution Plans were opened by the Resolution Professional. 2. Learned counsel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd while allowing the application following has been stated in Para 3 and 4: "3. Counsel for the Applicant submits that the main allegation against RP, is that the plan was submitted by the PRA in the sealed cover which was opened by the RP in the absence of CoC and PRAs which is against the Regulations. Ld. Counsel for the Applicant stated that this constitutes violation of the process of conducting the approval of the plan. 4. Counsel for the RP admits that he opened the cover due to non-availability of the password of the PRA. The reasons submitted by the RP is not satisfactory and we note that the RP has violated the due process under law. Hence, this Bench directs the concern RP to call for fresh bids from all the PRA....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (i) the amount to be paid to such creditors in the event of a liquidation of the corporate debtor under section 53; or (ii) the amount that would have been paid to such creditors, if the amount to be distributed under the resolution plan had been distributed in accordance with the order of priority in sub-section (1) of section 53, whichever is higher and provides for the payment of debts of financial creditors, who do not vote in favour of the resolution plan, in such manner as may be specified by the Board, which shall not be less than the amount to be paid to such creditors in accordance with sub-section (1) of section 53 in the event of a liquidation of the corporate debtor. Explanation 1.--For the removal of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....roval shall be deemed to have been given and it shall not be a contravention of that Act or law];" 30(3). The resolution professional shall present to the committee of creditors for its approval such resolution plans which confirm the conditions referred to in sub-section (2)." 9. Regulation 39 of the CIRP Regulations, 2016 also requires the Resolution Professional to look into the Resolution Plan submitted by the Applicants and to place the plan before CoC which is in compliance with Section 30(2). The opening of Resolution Plan by Resolution Professional is essential for further process in the CIRP. The Resolution Professional without opening the plan cannot come to any opinion whether the plan is complaint to Section 30(2) or....