2021 (6) TMI 1168
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Ankit Aggarwal, Advocate Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Senior Standing Counsel. O R D E R [Court hearing convened via video-conferencing on account of COVID-19] CM No. 18282/2021 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No. 18283/2021 2. The prayer made in the captioned application is to exempt the petitioner from filing sworn/affirmed affidavits along with the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ood rejected on 05.04.2021. 3.2. It appears that the principal reason given for the rejection of the aforementioned forms is that the petitioner's revision application filed under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short '1961 Act') was not pending as on the specified date, i.e., 31.01.2020. 3.3. It is Mr. Aggarwal's contention that the aforesaid reasoning given in the impugned orde....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(1)(b) of the Ordinance. In addition, thereto, reliance is also placed on the CBDT notification issued under the said Ordinance dated 24.06.2020, which, inter alia, indicated that the end date for filings, under Section 3(1) of the Ordinance, would be 31.03.2021 (See clause (ii) of the said notification). 3.5 Besides this, reliance is also placed on the order passed by the Supreme Court in Suo ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....6,81,546/- is payable towards "100% of the disputed tax". (See page 126 of the paper book.) 6.1 The respondent, therefore, pending the adjudication of the petition, without prejudice to its rights and contentions, will accept Forms 1 & 2 with 100% of the disputed tax. In case, according to the respondent/revenue, 100% of the disputed tax figure, is at variance with the aforementioned amount, th....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI