2024 (2) TMI 1002
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r the Petitioner: Mr. Arif Ahmad Khan, Mr. Manoj Awasthi, Mr. Luv Mahajan & Mr. Afroz Ahmad Khan, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has filed the appeal impugning order of cancellation of registration dated 15.12.2021 whereby the GST registration of the Petitioner has been cancelled retrospectively with effect fro....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gistration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively. Accordingly, the petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of the registration. 5. Further, the impugned order dated 15.12.2021 passed on the Show Cause Notice dated 04.09.2021 does not give any reasons for cancellation. It, however, states that the registration is liable to be cancelled for the following....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... are no dues stated to be due against the petitioner and the table shows nil demand. 7. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the said order reflected that the GST registration of petitioner stands cancelled from 01.07.2017 even though returns thereafter have been filed by the Petitioner. 8. He further submits that the petitioner is no longer interested in continuing the business a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....according to the respondent, one of the consequences for cancelling a taxpayer's registration with retrospective effect is that the taxpayer's customers are denied the input tax credit availed in respect of the supplies made by the tax payer during such period. Although, we do not consider it apposite to examine this aspect but assuming that the respondent's contention in required to consider this....
TaxTMI