Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2014 (12) TMI 1423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....J) 1. The appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 03/10/2011 passed by the ld. CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09, on the following grounds. 1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) has erred in fact and in law in holding that income derived from job work activity etc. by eligible unit u/s. 80IB are not derived from eligible business of eligible industrial under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....other hand, the ld. DR, Shri Niel Philip, contended that there is no manufacturing as such, therefore, the claimed deduction u/s. 80IB of the Act was rightly denied to the assessee. 2.1. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The facts, in brief, are that the assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing of lubricating oil and antistatic conn....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uary, 2013, CIT vs. Impel forge and allied Industries Ltd. (2008-TIOL-760-HC-P & H-IT), CIT vs. Sadhu Forging Ltd. (2011-TIOL-361-HC-Del-IT), Liberty India vs. CIT 317 ITR 218, we are of the view, that the assessee is entitled for deduction u/s. 80IB of the Act. Even otherwise, a provision in the taxing statute granting incentives for promoting growth and development should be construed liberally.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....laid down in CIT vs. Vinbros & Company 210 Taxman 252 (SC), CIT vs. Zainab Trading Pvt. Ltd. 333 ITR 144 (Mad.), CIT vs. Esquire Translam Industries 344 ITR 308 (Mad.), Titanor Components Ltd. vs. CIT 197 Taxman 441 (Del.), CIT vs. Ambuja Ginning Pressing & Oil Company Pvt. Ltd. 203 Taxman 34 (Mag)/15 Taxman.com 273 (Guj.) and Midas Polymer Compounds Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (2011) 197 Taxman 481(Ker.)(....