TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (2) TMI 837
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ustained the addition only on the basis of conjecture and surmises without deciding the matter on merits of the case. It is well known fact that filling of Form 67 before filing of return of income is directory in nature not mandatory in nature. Hence, dismissal of appellate order is in law and liable to be deleted." 3. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. The assessee has electronically filed its return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act on 15.01.2022 declaring total income of Rs. 1,20,61,610/- wherein, a sum of Rs. 30,10,546/- was claimed as foreign tax credit. This return was duly processed u/s 143(1) of the Act on 25.10.2022, wherein, the foreign tax credit of Rs. 30,10,546/- being the relief claimed u/s 90 of the Act was denied to the assessee on the ground that Form 67 was not filed by the assessee in support of the same. Subsequently, on 19.11.2022, the assessee filed Form 67 vide acknowledgement No. 811297900191122 claiming foreign tax credit of Rs. 30,58,484/- and filed rectification petition u/s 154 of the Act on 23.11.2022. The same was dismissed on the ground that Form 67 was not filed before the end of the relevant assessment ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ate or statement specifying the nature of income and the amount of tax deducted therefrom or paid by the assessee,- (a) from the tax authority of the country or the specified territory outside India; or (b) from the person responsible for deduction of such tax; or (c) signed by the assessee: Provided that the statement furnished by the assessee in clause (c) shall be valid if it is accompanied by,- (A) an acknowledgement of online payment or bank counter foil or challan for payment of tax where the payment has been made by the assessee; (B) proof of deduction where the tax has been deducted. [(9) The statement in Form No. 67 referred to in clause (i) of sub-rule (8) and the certificate or the statement referred to in clause (ii) of sub-rule (8) shall be furnished on or before the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which the income referred to in sub-rule (1) has been offered to tax or assessed to tax in India and the return for such assessment year has been furnished within the time specified under sub-section (1) or sub-section (4) of section 139: Provided that where the return has been furnished under sub-section (8A) of section 139, the s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ies for granting relief in respect of income on which taxes are paid in country outside India and such income is also taxable in India. Article 24 of India Australia DTAA provides for credit for foreign taxes. Article 24(4)(a) is relevant in the present context. Same is extracted below: "4. In the case of India, double taxation shall be avoided as follows: (a) the amount of Australian tax paid under the laws of Australia and in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, whether directly or by deduction, by a resident of India in respect of income from sources within Australia which has been subjected to tax both in India and Australia shall be allowed as a credit against the Indian tax payable in respect of such income but in an amount not exceeding that proportion of Indian tax which such income bears to the entire income chargeable to Indian tax: It was submitted by him that section 90 of the Act read with Article 24(4)(a) provides that Australian tax paid shall be allowed as a credit against the Indian tax but limited to proportion of Indian tax. Neither section 90 nor DTAA provides that FTC shall be disallowed for non-compliance with any procedural requirements. FT....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... credit of FTC. Reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner, (1992 Supp (1) Supreme Court Cases 21) wherein it observed that: "The mere fact that it is statutory does not matter one way or the other. There are conditions and conditions, Some may be substantive. mandatory and based on considerations of policy and some others may merely belong to the area of procedure. It will be erroneous to attach equal importance to the non-observance of all conditions irrespective of the purposes they were intended to serve." Further reliance was placed on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Sambhaji and Others v. Gangabai and Others, reported in (2008) 17 SCC 117, wherein it has been held that procedure cannot be a tyrant but only a servant. It is not an obstruction in the implementation of the provisions of the Act, but an aid. The procedures are handmaid and not the mistress. It is a lubricant and not a resistance. A procedural law should not ordinarily be construed as mandatory; the procedural law is always subservient to and is in aid to justice. It was submitt....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....kes apparent on the face of the record. 15. In his rejoinder, the learned counsel for the Assessee submitted that Form No.67 was available before the AO when the intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act dated 28.5.2020 was passed. He pointed out that the AO or the CIT(A) did not dismiss the Assessee application for rectification u/s.154 of the Act on the ground that the issue was debatable but rather the decision was given that the relevant rule was mandatory and hence non furnishing of Form No.67 before the due date u/s. 139(1) of the Act was fatal to the claim for FTC. 16. I have given a careful consideration to the rival submissions. I agree with the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the Assessee and hold that (i) Rule 128(9) of the Rules does not provide for disallowance of FTC in case of delay in filing Form No.67; (ii) filing of Form No.67 is not mandatory but a directory requirement and (iii) DTAA overrides the provisions of the Act and the Rules cannot be contrary to the Act. I am of the view that the issue was not debatable and there was only one view possible on the issue which is the view set out above. I am also of the view that the issue in the proceedings u....