TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (2) TMI 331
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t that the Assessment Order passed by the learned Assessing Officer, under s.143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Act, was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. 1(b) That, the learned Pr. CIT grossly erred, both on facts and in law, in assuming the jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 without considering the material fact that during the course of the original assessment proceedings, the learned AO vide his notices dated 22-12-2020 and 19-01-2021, had specifically raised queries on the subject issue i.e. eligibility of the appellant to claim deduction under s.80P of the Act in respect of the interest income derived by it from deposits made with cooperative banks, and in response, the appellant had duly furnished the necessary explanation along with documentary evidences which were duly verified and accepted by the AO after proper application of his mind and therefore, the invocation of the provisions of s. 263 merely on the ground that the AO ought to have taken some other view is not legally warranted and justifiable. 2. That, without prejudice to the above, the learned Pr. CIT grossly erred, both on facts and in law, in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(2) (d) of the Act was required to be disallowed and added back to the total income of the assessee which was not done at the time of assessment." 3. Thus, the Pr. CIT was of the view that interest income is required to be disallowed by the AO and added back to the total income of the assessee which was not done by the AO at the time of assessment. Consequently Pr. CIT has set aside the assessment order and directed the AO to re-examine only this issue of deduction u/s 80P in respect of interest income after conducting necessary investigation and providing due opportunity of hearing to the assessee. 3.1 Ld. AR of the assessee has referred to the notice u/s 142(1) dated 11.1.12020 & 22.12.2020 whereby the AO has specifically raised a question about the allowability of deduction u/s 80P in respect of the interest income received on deposit with Co-operative bank as under: ANNEXURE In connection with scrutiny assessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 (FY 2017-18) in the case of your own, it is brought to your notice as under: In your return of income filed for the AY 208-19, you have claimed a sum of Rs. 66,06,742/- as Chapter VI-A deduction u/s 80P. On perusal ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... but the AO has duly conducted an inquiry and taken a possible view on this issue. Ld. AR has relied upon various decisions of this tribunal on this issue wherein the Tribunal has decided this issue in favour of the assessee by holding that the interest received by the assesse from the Co-operative Bank is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d). 5. Ld. DR has not disputed that this tribunal has taken view on this issue and decided this claim in favour of the assesse. 6. Having considered the rival submission as well as relevant material on record at the outset, we note that in the recent decision dated 16.01.2024 this tribunal in case of Pr. CIT vs. Bhopal Dugdh Sangh Sahakari Maryadit in ITANo.71/Ind/2023 and CO No.03/Ind/2023 has considered and decided this issue in para 5 to 7 as under: "5. We have considered rival submissions as well as relevant material on record. The AO has disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of the interest income received by the assessee on the fixed deposit made with Bhopal Co-operative Central Bank on the ground that the only interest or dividend received on the investment made with the other Co-operative Soc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....to in sub-section (2), there shall be deducted, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, the sums specified in sub-section (2), in computing the total income of the assessee. (2). The sums referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely :- (a)............................................................................................ (b)............................................................................................ (c)............................................................................................ (d) in respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the cooperative society from its investments with any other co-operative society, the whole of such income;" On a perusal of Sec. 80P(2)(d), it can safely be gathered that interest income derived by an assessee co-operative society from its investments held with any other co-operative society shall be deducted in computing its total income. We may herein observe, that what is relevant for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) is that the interest income should have been derived from the investments m....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... ITO in ITANo. 317/Ind/2023 vide order dated 10.01.2024 has considered and decided this issue in para 9 to 12 as under: "9. We have considered the facts, rival submissions and perused the record placed before us. The assessee is a Credit Cooperative Society and during the year under consideration, it has earned interest income of Rs. 10,77,910/- on FDRs. The assessee has shown the interest income on FDR under the head "income from other sources" and against such interest income has claimed incidental expenses including interest paid to depositors at Rs. 5,38,955/-, commissioner paid to Collection Agent at Rs. 4,71,586/- and stationery and printing expenses at Rs. 28,450/-. Both the lower authorities have held that the incidental expenses claimed are in the nature of business expenditure and needs to be allowed against business receipts and have also observed that FDR interest being income from other sources is not eligible for deduction u/s 80-P of the Act. 10. We, however, on perusal of computation of income filed in the paper book at page no.11 noticed that the alleged FDR interest income has been received by the assessee from deposits made with Indore Premier C....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the co-operative society from its investments with any other co-operative society, the whole of such income; (e) in respect of any income derived by the co-operative society from the letting of godowns or warehouses for storage, processing or facilitating the marketing of commodities, the whole of such income; (f) in the case of a co-operative society, not being a housing society or an urban consumers' society, or a society carrying on transport business or a society engaged in the performance of any manufacturing operations with the aid of power, where the gross total income does not exceed twenty thousand rupees, the amount of any income by way of interest on securities chargeable under section 18 or any income from house property chargeable under section 22. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section, an urban consumers' co- operative society means a society for the benefit of the consumers within the limits of a municipal corporation, municipality, municipal committee, notified area committee, town area, or cantonment. (3) In a case where the assessee is entitled als....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....xman 282(SC) and by discussing the decision rendered by Hon'ble Bombay High and Hon'ble Gujarat High Court wherein it is held that interest income earned by the Co-operative Society on its investment made with co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act by returning following findings: "8. We have given a thoughtful consideration to the contentions advanced by the Id. Authorized representatives for both the parties in context of the aforesaid issue under consideration. As stated by the ld. A.R, and rightly so, the issue that interest received by a co-operative society on its deposits with co-operative banks would be eligible for deduction w/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act is covered in assessee's favour by orders of the various coordinate benches of the Tribunal in the following cases: (i). M/s Solitaire CHS Ltd. Vs. Pr.CIT-26, Mumbai, ITA No.3155/Mum/2019, dated 29.11.2019 (ii) Land and Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. ITO (2017) 46 CCH 52 (Mum.) (iii) M/s C. Green Cooperative Housing and Society Ltd. Vs. ITO- 21(3)(2), Mumbai (ITA No. 1343/Mum/2017, dated 31.03.2017. (iv) Marvwanjee Cama Park Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. V....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....co-operative societies, the Pr. CIT was of the view that the interest income earned on such investments/deposits would not be eligible for deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of the Act. 7. After necessary deliberations, we are unable to persuade ourselves to be in agreement with the view taken by the Pr. CIT. Before proceeding any further, we may herein reproduce the relevant extract of the aforesaid statutory provision, viz. Sec. 80P(2) (d), as the same would have a strong bearing on the adjudication of the issue before us. "80P(2) (d) (1). Where in the case of an assessee being a co- operative society, the gross total income includes any income referred to in sub- section (2), there shall be deducted, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, the sums specified in subsection (2), in computing the total income of the assessee. (2). The sums referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely:- (a) ......................................................................................... (b) ..................................................... (c) ..................................................... (d) in ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....terest income derived by a cooperative society from its investments held with a cooperative bank would be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2) (d) of the Act. 8. We shall now advert to the judicial pronouncements that have been relied upon by the Id. A.R. We find that the issue that a co-operative society would be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) on the interest income derived from its investments held with a cooperative bank is covered in favour of the assessee in the following cases: (i) Land and Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. ITO (2017) 46 CCH $2 (Mum) (ii) M/s C. Green Cooperative Housing and Society Ltd. Vs. ITO-21(3)(2), Mumbai (ITA No. 1343/Mum/2017, dated 31.03.2017 (iii) Marvwanjee Cama Park Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. ITO-Range-20(2)(2). Mumbai (ITA No. 6139/Mum/2014, dated 27.09.2017. (iv). Kaliandas Udyog Bhavan Pemises Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. ITO, 21(2)(1), Mumbai. We further find that the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India Vs. CIT (2016) 389....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the case of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr. Vs. Totagars Cooperative Sale Society (2017) 392 ITR 74 (Karn) and Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of State Bank Of India Vs. CIT (2016) 389 ITR 578 (Guj), wherein it was observed that the interest income earned by a cooperative society on its investments held with a cooperative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Act. 9. Be that as it may, in our considered view, as the A.O while framing the assessment had taken a possible view, and therein concluded that the assessee would be entitled for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2) (d) on the interest income earned on its investments/deposits with cooperative banks, therefore, the Pr. CIT was in error in exercising his revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 for dislodging the same. In fact, as observed by us hereinabove, the aforesaid view taken by the A.O at the time of framing of the assessment was clearly supported by the order of the jurisdictional Tribunal in the case of Land and Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. ITO (2017) 46 CCH 52 (Mum). Accordingly, finding no justification on the part of the Pr. CIT, who in exercise of his powers und....