2016 (5) TMI 1613
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....NEGI, JM This appeal has been filed by the revenue against order dated 30/12/2013 passed by Ld CIT(A)-41, Mumbai for the assessment year 2010-11. 2. The revenue has challenged the impugned order on following effective grounds:- 1. "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition made u/s 2(22)(e) of the Act holding that th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Act, 1961(in short 'the Act.') comes to Rs. 6,40,820/-. 4. The Ld. Counsel further submitted that the ground no. 2 pertains to computation of book profit, and the tax effect thereof is irrelevant because as per assessment order dated 05/03/2013 passed u/s 143(3) of the Act, the tax payable under the normal provisions of the Act is higher than the tax payable u/s 115JB of the Act. 5. The Ld. ....
TaxTMI