2024 (2) TMI 188
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'UPGST Act, 2017'). c. The petitioner also made transactions in the year 2019-20 and in this regard, bills were issued, in which details of the goods were mentioned. d. On July 24, 2019, an inspection was carried out at the premises of the petitioner and at the time of inspection, the authorities asked the petitioner to deposit the amount in DRC - 03. e. Thereafter, a summon was issued to the petitioner under Section 70 of the UPGST Act, 2017 directing the petitioner to appear before the concerned authority on August 13, 2019, at 11:00 am along with stock register and other relevant documents for verification. f. A show cause notice was also issued by the respondents on July 22, 2020, under Section 74 of the UPGST Act, 2017 for tax period 2019-20, alleging that the petitioner wrongly availed input tax credit amounting to INR 22,00,00,000/- against bogus tax invoices and utilized the same by fraud or misstatement, suppression of facts, etc. g. Another notice was issued on September 17, 2020, directing the petitioner to furnish a reply on October 6, 2020. Petitioner thereaft....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....inciple, known as the plain meaning rule or the literal rule of interpretation, emphasizes the importance of interpreting statutes based on their plain and ordinary meaning, as understood by the average person reading the text of the statute. Moreover, the disjunctive function of "or" in statutes is essential for upholding principles of fairness, equity, and access to justice. By offering alternative paths or options, statutes accommodate diverse individual needs and situations, promoting inclusivity and mitigating potential disparities or injustices. This is particularly significant in areas of law concerning rights, benefits, and entitlements, where the flexibility provided by "or" ensures that legal provisions can be applied in a manner that reflects the realities and complexities of human experiences. 8. In Commissioner of Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh -v- The Modi Sugar Mills Ltd., reported in, MANU/SC/0276/1960, the Supreme Court affirmed that while interpreting taxing statutes, courts must look at the words used in the statute, and interpret a taxing statute considering what has been clearly expressed: "....In interpreting a taxing statute, equitable considerations ar....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssioner Commercial Tax and Others reported in 2022 SCC OnLine All 1088, underscored the significance of providing an opportunity for personal hearing as contemplated under Section 75(4) of the UPGST Act, 2017. Relevant paragraphs have been extracted below: "9. From perusal of Section 75(4) of the Act, 2017 it is evident that opportunity of hearing has to be granted by authorities under the Act, 2017 where either a request is received from the person chargeable with tax or penalty for opportunity of hearing or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person. Thus, where an adverse decision is contemplated against the person, such a person even need not to request for opportunity of personal hearing and it is mandatory for the authority concerned to afford opportunity of personal hearing before passing an order adverse to such person. *** 12. It has also been admitted in the counter affidavit that except permitting the petitioner to reply to the show cause notice, opportunity of personal hearing has not been afforded to the petitioner. Thus the legislative mandate of Section 75(4) of the Act to the authorities to afford opportunity of hearing....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the context of an assessment order creating heavy civil liability, observing such minimal opportunity of hearing is a must. Principle of natural justice would commend to this Court to bind the authorities to always ensure to provide such opportunity of hearing. It has to be ensured that such opportunity is granted in real terms. Here, we note, the impugned order itself has been passed on 25.11.2022, while reply to the show-cause-notice had been entertained on 14.11.2022. The stand of the assessee may remain unclear unless minimal opportunity of hearing is first granted. Only thereafter, the explanation furnished may be rejected and demand created. 9. Not only such opportunity would ensure observance of rules of natural of justice but it would allow the authority to pass appropriate and reasoned order as may serve the in7 terest of justice and allow a better appreciation to arise at the next/appeal stage, if required." 12. Recently, in M/s Primeone Work Force Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, reported in 2024:AHC-LKO:3533-DB, the Division Bench of this Court, stated that an opportunity of hearing is mandatorily required to be given if tax and penalty are to be imposed: ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tural justice." 34. Likewise, in C.B. Gautam v. Union of India [(1993) 1 SCC 78] , this Court once again held that principle of natural justice was applicable even though it was not statutorily required. The Court took the view that even in the absence of statutory provision to this effect, the authority was liable to give notice to the affected parties while purchasing their properties under Section 269-UD of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was further observed that : (SCC p. 104, para 30) "30. ... The very fact that an imputation of tax evasion arises where an order for compulsory purchase is made and such an imputation casts a slur on the parties to the agreement to sell lead to the conclusion that before such an imputation can be made against the parties concerned, they must be given an opportunity to show cause that the undervaluation in the agreement for sale was not with a view to evade tax." It is, therefore, all the more necessary that an opportunity of hearing is provided. 35. From the aforesaid discussion, it becomes clear that the opportunity to provide hearing before making any decision was considered to be a basic requirement in the co....
TaxTMI