Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (1) TMI 983

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....od from 2004-05 upto 05/2007. ii. I appropriate the amount of Rs.5,39,67,516/- (Rupees Five crores thirty nine lakhs sixtyseven thousand five hundred and sixteen only paid by M/s DDPL vide challans dt.18/02/2010 & 20/04/2010 towards the demand confirmed as at (i) above. iii. I order payment of appropriate amount of interest on the service tax above under section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. iv. I appropriate the amount of Rs.52,88,640/- (Rupees Fifty two lakhs eighty eight thousand six hundred and fourty only) paid by M/s. DDPL vide challan dt.18/03/2010 towards the demand of interest confirmed as at 'iii' above. v. In respect of the demand confirmed at (i), I impose penalty of Rs. 100/- per day upto 17.04.06 and with effect from 18.04.06, Rs.200/- per day or @2% the service tax, per month, whichever is higher, till the date of actual payment of the outstanding amount of service tax, which shall not exceed the total service tax liability confirmed as above, under section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, vi. I impose penalty of Rs. 1000/- (Rupees One thousand only) under section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. vii. I impose pena....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aid period. Further, it is argued that the services provided against the agreement dated 31.3.2005 being executory in nature and not management consultancy, therefore, no service tax is payable by them. Referring to the agreement dated 31.03.2005, the learned Sr. Advocate submitted that the services are not in the nature of advice, consultancy or technical assistance alone. The responsibility, role and function of the appellant in its entirety as per Clause 8 of the said agreement reveal a major role and responsibility of the appellant in execution of the project. It is submitted that the adjudicating authority had ignored the said submission of the appellant. In support, the learned Sr. Advocate referred to the following decisions: a. Basti Sugar Mills Co. Ltd Vs CCE, 2007 (7) STR 431 (T). Maintained by the SC in 2012 (25) STR J.154 (SC). b. Rolls Royce Indus Power (1) Ltd Vs CCE, 2006 (3) STR 292 (T) c. Nirulas Corner House Pvt. Ltd Vs CST, 2009 (14) STR 131 (T) d. Suzlon Windfarm Services Ltd Vs CCE, 2014 (33) STR 65 (T) e. CMS (1) Operations & Maintenance Co.P.Ltd Vs CCE, 2007 (7) STR 369 (T) f. CCE Vs Sahney Kirkwood Pvt. L....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....liance only on the agreement dated 31.03.2005, hence the statements based on other two agreements are of no consequence to determine the taxability and classification of service or imposition of penalty. Further, he has submitted that the allegation of fabrication of documents are not relevant to determine the tax liability of services under Management Consultancy Service as the Commissioner chose to ignore other two agreements and simply proceeded with the agreement dated 31.03.2005. Further, the learned advocate submitted that the amount paid during the course of investigation with the department should not be treated as admission of liability or guilt. Further, they have submitted that collection of taxes from M/s. Manyata Promotors Pvt Ltd. for certain period cannot lead to the inference that services rendered by the appellant are taxable. It is his contention that there is no estoppel in law and in support he referred to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Kalidas Dhanjibhai vs. State of Bombay: AIR 1995 SC 62 and Sports Club of Gujarat Ltd. vs. UOI: 2010 (20) STR 17 (Guj.). 3.5 Further, he has submitted that extended period of limitation cannot be invo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....it included consultancy, advice or assistance which consisted of conceptual designing, etc., of any working system of any organisation. This definition focused on what the service provider was actually doing (conceptualising, designing, development, modification, rectification) in relation to any working system. After 01.5.2006, various working systems of an organisation are spelt out viz., financial, logistics, human resources, marketing, procurement, etc.. Any technical advice or consultancy in these fields or in other similar area of management was treated as Management Consultancy Service. The claim of the appellant that their company is for development of real estate projects and hence, it cannot be inferred that they were providing Management Consultancy Service, is not acceptable. It is the service provided by the appellant which is relevant and not the activity of the appellant in general, which has been specifically discussed by the learned Commissioner in para 14 of the order. 4.2 Referring to Clause 7, 8 and 8.8 of the agreement dated 31.03.2005, the learned Authorised Representative has submitted that this service indicate advice and assistance rendered by the appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g with interest and imposition of penalties. Further, he has also submitted that the Commissioner was right in not extending the benefit of CENVAT credit in the impugned order in absence of documents/evidences submitted by the appellant. 5. Heard both sides and perused the records. 6. The issues involved in the present appeal for determination are whether: (i) The service rendered by the appellant during the period 2004-05 to May 2007 to M/s. Manyata Promoters Pvt. Ltd. & M/s. Golf Link Software Park Pvt. Ltd. be classified under taxable category of 'Management Consultancy Service' and Service Tax is payable invoking extended period of limitation; and (ii) CENVAT credit be admissible for the said period in rendering the service, if held to be taxable. 7. The appellant during the relevant period rendered services to M/s. Manyata Promoters Pvt Ltd and M/s. Golf Link Software Park Pvt. Ltd. and received consideration for providing such services. Three agreements claimed to have been entered into between the appellant and the said service receivers dated 06.04.2003, 31.03.2005 and 01.04.2005. In the impugned order the learned Commissioner rejecting the credibility of agreement....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fice at Second Floor, Classic Courts, Richmond Road, Bangalore - 560 001, represented by its Chairman and Managing Director Mr. Reddy Veeranna for the FIRST PART (hereinafter referred to as the "MANYATA" which expression shall, the context means and requires shall include its successors-in-title and assigns). AND M/S.DYNASTY DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, a Company incorporated under the CompaniesAct,1956,having its Office at Embassy Point, No.150, Infantry Road, Bangalore - 560 001,represented by its Director Mr. Jitendra Virwani (hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT DEVELOPMENT MANAGER", which expression shall, wherever the context means and requires shall include its successors-in-title and assigns). NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH AS UNDER: 1) REPRESENTATIONS AND ASSURANCES I. WHEREAS MANYATA are the allottees under Lease Cum Sale agreements all executed by Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) and MANYATA and the KIADB have also vide separate possession letters handed over possession of the property allotted on the Lease cum sale basis of all that piece and parcel of industrial lands in situated in vari....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....thority" means the concerned authority for securing several permission for the Development. 2.3) "Planning Application" means the application for sanction and permission to carry out the Development made to the Local Planning Authority or to be made by the Project Development Managers at the expense MANYATA or any alternative application or variation or amendment to an application made which may subsequently be required to make; 2.4) "the Building Contractor" means a Contractor of suitable experience with adequate financial resources and good reputation to be appointed under the Building Contract by MANYATA to carry out the construction activities and the related Development; 2.5) "the Building Contract" means a contract to carry out the Development to be made between (1) MANYATA and (2) the Building Contractor: 2.6) "Development" means the carrying out of the works necessary to secure the erection and completion on the Site of the Project consisting of buildings, all the Individual Units and their infrastructure with the planning permission obtained in response to the planning Application and the Plans and where the context so admits and require....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Project Development Managers shall make available to MANYATA who shall within 06 weeks from the handing over the plan, submit to the Planning Authority for approval and MANYATA shall then use all reasonable endeavours to obtain the sanction for the plan submitted for the Development asper the Application, subject to the conditions which are levied. The Project Development Managers will provide the copy of all the relevant plans as per the schedule of development and also render the necessary assistance in the process of plan approval. 4) SITE OFFICE: MANYATA will permit Project Development Managers to establish a Site Office on the Schedule Property. The expenses of running and maintenance of this site office will be the responsibility of PDM. 5) CONSIDERATION FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THE MANAGER'S FUNCTIONS AND OBLIGATIONS: 5.1 Project Development Managers shall perform the functions and obligations on his part specified in this Agreement in consideration of the payment of: 5.2) Project Development Managers' Fee being computed as under: 5.2.1 The MANYATA shall pay the Project Development Manager 5% (Five per c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... within 04 weeks after obtaining Plan Sanction prepare and deliver to MANYATA progress charts and cash flow projections for all items of expenditure to be incurred by MANYATA in connection with the Development; 6.2 Report of all other arrangements connected with the carrying out of the Development, from time to time; 6.3 Ensure that at all times during the Development adequate, competent and suitably qualified and experienced staff of Project Development Managers are employed properly to perform the functions and obligations of Project Development Managers under this Agreement; 6.4) Fix Meeting wherein Project Development Managers shall provide all the necessary information with regard to the progress of the development which shall be recorded and signed by Project Development Managers and MANYATA or their respective representatives; 7) MANYATA TO ENTER INTO THE BUILDING CONTRACT: If necessary, MANYATA shall enter into a Building Contract recommended by the Project Development Manager with a Building Contractor for the Development of the PROJECT 8) SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT MANAGER'S GENERAL FUNCTIONS ANDOBLIGATIONS....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rds, 8.10) The Project Development Managers shall act at all times so as to protect the legitimate interests of MANYATA and will take all reasonable steps and exercise reasonable care and caution to keep all expenses to a minimum, consistent with sound contractual and engineering Practices. 8.11) Project Development Managers subject to the contract shall have complete control of the personnel performing the Services 9) LICENCE TO THE MANAGER: During the period of development, as long as there is no breach of the terms of the agreement, the Project Development Managers shall have irrevocable licence and authority to enter upon the site for the purpose of carrying out its functions and obligations under this Agreement without reference to MANYATA; 10) DEVELOPMENT PLANNING. Project Development Managers shall during the development be entitled to take decisions on planning the implementation of the contract, execution of the work, the priority of works to be done changes to be made in any works items and the day to day management of the development of the project which in the opinion of the PDM is reasonably necessary for the purpos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....completion of the project. 15.2) MANYATA shall endeavour to pay all proper fees of the Professional receipt by MANYATA of a written demand by Project Development Managers; 15.3) MANYATA shall pay for all the expenses of the Development including the following but not limited to the same: a) Travel expenses for Development; (to the concerned personnel) b) All expenses for coordination with several agencies involved in the Development; 5.4) COMPUTATION OF ACCOUNTS: On the completion of every Building Managers shall prepare and finalise accounts for the said Building and on such finalisation of accounts for the said Building and on such finalization of accounts, pay to Project Development Managers the balance amounts of the Management Fee after making adjustments for the advances, if any, received by the Project Development Manager: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 18) MANYATA TO PAY FEES ETC: MANYATA shall pay all fees, charges, fines, penalties and other payments which during the progress of the Development may properly be payable to any Authority, Statutory Body or any competent person in respect of the Development; ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re tech park, hardware tech park, entertainment centre, etc.. The fees for rendering the service prescribed under Clause 5.2.1 to be paid to the appellant is 5% of the expenditure incurred on the construction and development of the project; also the computation of the construction and development expenses are prescribed at Clause 5.2.3. of the agreement. Analysing the stipulations of the said Agreement dated 31.3.2005, it cannot be said that the arrangement between the appellant and M/s. Manyata Promoters Pvt. Ltd. for execution of the project as a whole; on the contrary, it reveals that appellant has been engaged to advise/assist M/s. Manyata Promoters Pvt. Ltd. in implementation and completion of the project. Therefore, the claim of the appellant that they have been appointed to execute the project has been rightly rejected by the learned Commissioner as the activities/performance stipulated under the Agreement clearly discloses that the services rendered in the management of the project for its completion by engaging suitable contractors, subcontractors, team of professional, obtaining approvals etc.; thus, in the nature of advice, consultancy or technical assistance. No contrar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nition of 'Management Consultancy Service' can safely be adopted to the present case. In paragraph 6 of the judgment, it was observed as follows: "6. We have considered the submissions made by both sides. A careful perusal of the appellants services to M/s. Transocean and M/s. Tide Water detailed in para 2 above makes it clear that the appellants were advising the clients about various aspects relating to Management. The services are not executionery in nature and are clearly advisory in nature. The definition of "Management Consultant" is so worded that the services performed by the appellants clearly fall within its scope and for that one only has to read the definition of "Management Consultant" quoted earlier vis-à-vis the description of impugned services (detailed in para 2) to come to such finding. The expressions like "any service", "either directly or indirectly", "in connection with the management", "in any manner" appearing in the definition of 'Management Consultancy Service' are expressions which are expansionary rather than restrictive. Thus, this definition is wide enough to include advisory services rendered in connection with the management of an org....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ervice' as provided under Section 65A of Finance Act,1994 is very clear as the term contained in the statute indicates that services rendered relating to conceptualising, devising, development, etc., of the working system of the said companies; advising on commercial aspects would come under the scope of 'Management Consultancy Services'. 16. In the present case, commencing from identification of the contractors, sub-contractors, professional team, day-to-day management of cash flow, completion of the project in accordance with plan, etc., with active participation and advice of the appellant from time-to-time rendered to M/s. Manyata Promoters Pvt. Ltd., fall within the scope of advice, consultancy or technical assistance. Besides the statements of various persons recorded from time-to-time, reveal that the activities by the appellant acknowledge to be in the nature of managerial service rendered to M/s. Manyata Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Besides, we find that the appellant had collected Service Tax as per Clause 5.2.1 of the Agreement in few instances from M/s. Manyata Promoters Pvt. Ltd. but not paid the same to the department. Thus, the Project Development Management Fee collected ....