Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (2) TMI 218

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Bills of Entry for clearance of the same. The assessment was completed. It was based on MRP; however, the appellants were aggrieved over the assessment. According to them, the impugned goods are not covered by the relevant notification for purposes of levy of additional duty of customs under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act. According to them, the automobile lamps which are imported are classifiable under heading No. 853921.29 and not under 8539.2190. It was stated that Notification No. 2/2006-C.E. (N.T.), dated 1-3-2006 as amended is relevant. In terms of the relevant entry, the lamps for automobiles are specifically excluded from the entry in serial No. 91 of the said notification and hence, the assessment of levy under Section 3(....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... specifically excludes the 'lamps for automobiles' vide amending Notification No. 24/2006 dt. 14-11-2006. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) is apparently applying Sl. No. 97 of the said notification wherein the rate of abatement allowed is 33.5%. Ostensibly, Sl. No. 97 of the said notification covers only "parts, components and assemblies" of the automobiles. By no stretch of imagination, the lamps can be treated as either parts or components of any automobiles. Indisputably, the lamp alone cannot also be considered as an 'assembly' of any automobile. Thus, the learned lower appellate authority has erred in holding that the imported' goods are covered under Sl. No. 97 of the said notification for the purposes of assessment of levy under th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by way of this notification. There are two rates of duty 37% and 40%. However, there was an amendment to this notification by way of Notification 11/2006 dated 29-5-2006, wherein after Serial No. 96 in the parent notification some more entries were inserted. The said notification 11/2006 is reproduced  below : Automobile parts, components and assemblies, plant growth regulator and toothbrush - MRP based assessment - Amendment to Notification No. 2/2006-C.E. (N.T.) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and sub­section (2)-of section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendments....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Table, against S. No. 91, in column (3), for the words "The following goods", the words 'The following goods, other than lamps for automobiles" shall be substituted. [Notification No. 24/2006-C.E. (N.T.), dated 14-11-2006] 7.1 In terms of the amendment, there is an amendment in serial No. 91 of the parent notification wherein, there is a substitution for "following goods other than lamps for automobiles". The argument of the learned advocate is that lamps for automobiles have been excluded in serial No. 91. So this is a conscious exclusion, therefore this cannot be brought under serial No. 97. 8. On a careful consideration, we are not inclined to agree with the contention of the learned Advocate, because the different entries in the....