TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2024 (1) TMI 667
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....this common order. The challenge in both these appeals is to the orders passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC, New Delhi, whereby the revision filed by the appellant has since been dismissed and the orders passed by the District Forum as also the State Commission have been affirmed holding that the appellant is liable to pay the amount of the sum assured on the death of the assured. 3. The sole question involved in these appeals is as to what would be the date from which the policy becomes effective; whether it would be the date on which the policy is issued or the date of the commencement mentioned in the policy or it would be the date of the issuance of the deposit receipt or cover note. The District Consume....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y any claim on death if the Life Assured, whether sane or insane, commits suicide within 12 months from the date of issue of this Policy or the date of any reinstatement of this Policy." 6. From the documents on record in the case of Usha Soni, we find that the first cheque was issued on 26.09.2012. The policy issuance and commencement date in the Policy is mentioned as 28.09.2012. Further, the next premium due was on 28.09.2013. Grace period is 30 days under Clause 1(iv) of the terms and conditions. Clause 5 mentions that the policy would lapse. Clause 6 provides for reinstatement. However, since the renewal amount was not paid within the time allowed, the policy stood lapsed and subsequently, upon payment of the premium against the laps....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... was issued and the date of commencement was notified to be the same date. 10. 14th July 2012, therefore, cannot be taken to be the date of issuance of policy. It is only the date of issue of receipt of the initial premium. The date of issue of policy being 16.07.2012 is actually the date from which the policy commences and becomes effective. 11. In the present case, period of 12 months from 16.07.2012 will complete on 15.07.2013. It would be the last day of 12 months as from the next day, i.e., 16.07.2013 the next month will start. Unfortunately, the incidence of suicide is on 15.07.2013, the last day of 12 months. The date of proposal cannot be treated to be the date of policy until and unless on the date of proposal, initial deposit as....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the appellant. In construing a particular Clause of the Contract, it is only reasonable to construe that the words and the terms used therein must be given effect to. In other words, one part of the Contract cannot be made otiose by giving a meaning to the policy of the contract. Then again, when the same Clause of a contract uses two different expressions, ordinarily those different expressions convey different meanings and both the expressions cannot be held to be conveying one and the same meaning. Bearing in mind the aforesaid principle of construction, if Clause 4- B of the terms of policy is scrutinized, it become crystal clear that the date on which the risk under the policy has commenced is different from the date of the policy. In ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er the proviso, if the life assured commits suicide before expiry of one year reckoned from the date of the policy, then the provisions of the Clause under the heading "suicide" printed on the back of the policy would apply. In a case therefore where a policy is dated back for one year prior to the date of the issue of the policy, the proviso contained in Clause 4-B cannot be operated at all. When parties had agreed to the terms of the contract, it is impermissible to hold that a particular term was never intended to be acted upon. The proviso to Clause 4-B will have its full play if the expression "the date of the policy" is interpreted to mean the date on which the policy was issued and not the date on which the risk under the policy has ....